Stimulus generalization as a function of drive level, and the relation between two measures of response strength

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):357 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0021856

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Compound stimuli, drive strength, and primary stimulus generalization.Albert F. Healey - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (5):536.
Gradients of drive stimulus (Sd) intensity generalization.Harry G. Yamaguchi - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (4):298.
Stimulus generalization as a function of level of motivation.David R. Thomas & Richard A. King - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (5):323.
Stimulus generalization as a function of drive shift.Robert B. Zajonc & David V. Cross - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):363.
Generalization of reinforcement among similar responses made in altered stimulus situations.Melvin H. Marx & Benjamin B. Bernstein - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (6):355.
Stimulus generalization as a function of the serial position of the stimulus during prior training.Marvin E. Shaw & F. A. King - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (4):228.
Studies of response generalization in conditioning. I. Stimulus generalization during response generalization.D. D. Wickens - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (3):221.
The relation between conditioned stimulus intensity and response strength.Charles C. Perkins Jr - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (4):225.
Stimulus categorizing in the generalization of a voluntary response.Eric Aronson & Albert Erlebacher - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):585.
Stimulus generalization as a function of the number and range of generalization test stimuli.David R. Thomas & George Bistey - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (6):599.
Isolation effects: Stimulus and response generalization as explanatory concepts.Slater E. Newman & Eli Saltz - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (5):467.
Response strength as a function of changed intertrial interval.Claire B. Ernhart - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (4):208.
Primary stimulus generalization under different percentages of reinforcement in eyelid conditioning.William E. Vandament & Louis Price - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (2):162.
Stimulus generalization after equal training on two stimuli.Harry I. Kalish & Norman Guttman - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (2):139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
24 (#637,523)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references