Results for 'auditory cues differences'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  40
    The Influence of Auditory Cues on Bodily and Movement Perception.Tasha R. Stanton & Charles Spence - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 10:3001.
    The sounds that result from our movement and that mark the outcome of our actions typically convey useful information concerning the state of our body and its movement, as well as providing pertinent information about the stimuli with which we are interacting. Here we review the rapidly growing literature investigating the influence of non-veridical auditory cues (i.e., inaccurate in terms of their context, timing, and/or spectral distribution) on multisensory body and action perception, and on motor behavior. Inaccurate (...) cues provide a unique opportunity to study cross-modal processes: the ability to detect the impact of each sense when they provide a slightly different message is greater. Additionally, given that similar cross-modal processes likely occur regardless of the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory input, studying incongruent interactions are likely to also help us predict interactions between congruent inputs. The available research convincingly demonstrates that perceptions of the body, of movement, and of surface contact features (e.g., roughness) are influenced by the addition of non-veridical auditory cues. Moreover, auditory cues impact both motor behavior and emotional valence, the latter showing that sounds that are highly incongruent with the performed movement induce feelings of unpleasantness (perhaps associated with lower processing fluency). Such findings are relevant to the design of auditory cues associated with product interaction, and the use of auditory cues in sport performance and therapeutic situations given the impact on motor behavior. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  36
    Sound localization with conflicting visual and auditory cues.H. A. Witkin, S. Wapner & T. Leventhal - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (1):58.
  3.  16
    Primary stimulus generalization in discrimination learning as a function of number of trials and incidental cue differences.Leopold O. Walder - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (2):178.
  4.  16
    Surface Stickiness Perception by Auditory, Tactile, and Visual Cues.Hyungeol Lee, Eunsil Lee, Jiye Jung & Junsuk Kim - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10:471990.
    This study aimed to explore the psychophysical bases of multisensory surface stickiness perception by investigating how sensitively humans perceive different levels of stickiness intensity conveyed by auditory, tactile, and visual cues. First, we sorted five different sticky stimuli by perceived intensity in ascending order for each modality separately and evaluated the discrimination sensitivities of each participant using a fitted psychometric curve. Results showed that perceptual intensity orders were not identical to physical intensity order and that the sequential order (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. The emotion of sound target modulates the auditory gaze cueing effect.Xinghe Feng, Xinmeng Shi & Zhonghua Hu - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
    The auditory gaze cueing effect (auditory-GCE) is a faster response to auditory targets at an eye-gaze cue location than at a non-cue location. Previous research has found that auditory-GCE can be influenced by the integration of both gaze direction and emotion conveyed through facial expressions. However, it is unclear whether the emotional information of auditory targets can be cross-modally integrated with gaze direction to affect auditory-GCE. Here, we set neutral faces with different gaze directions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  27
    What Are You Waiting For? Real‐Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.Marcus E. Galle, Jamie Klein-Packard, Kayleen Schreiber & Bob McMurray - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (1):e12700.
    Speech unfolds over time, and the cues for even a single phoneme are rarely available simultaneously. Consequently, to recognize a single phoneme, listeners must integrate material over several hundred milliseconds. Prior work contrasts two accounts: (a) a memory buffer account in which listeners accumulate auditory information in memory and only access higher level representations (i.e., lexical representations) when sufficient information has arrived; and (b) an immediate integration scheme in which lexical representations can be partially activated on the basis (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  7.  25
    What Are You Waiting For? Real‐Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.Marcus E. Galle, Jamie Klein-Packard, Kayleen Schreiber & Bob McMurray - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (1):e12700.
    Speech unfolds over time, and the cues for even a single phoneme are rarely available simultaneously. Consequently, to recognize a single phoneme, listeners must integrate material over several hundred milliseconds. Prior work contrasts two accounts: (a) a memory buffer account in which listeners accumulate auditory information in memory and only access higher level representations (i.e., lexical representations) when sufficient information has arrived; and (b) an immediate integration scheme in which lexical representations can be partially activated on the basis (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  8.  12
    Contexto social y bullying en preparatorias rurales. El Fuerte, Sinaloa.Rosalva Ruiz-Ramírez, Emma Zapata-Martelo & José Luis García-Cué - 2021 - Voces de la Educación 6 (11):135-156.
    The objective was to analyze the influence of the social context on bullying. A mixed investigation was proposed: the social context was analyzed, were applied questionnaires and interviews; were analyzed descriptively, normality tests and non-parametric tests; different manifestations of bullying are presented; their frequency varies between both high schools.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  46
    Cues for self-recognition in point-light displays of actions performed in synchrony with music.Vassilis Sevdalis & Peter E. Keller - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (2):617-626.
    Self–other discrimination was investigated with point-light displays in which actions were presented with or without additional auditory information. Participants first executed different actions in time with music. In two subsequent experiments, they watched point-light displays of their own or another participant’s recorded actions, and were asked to identify the agent . Manipulations were applied to the visual information and to the auditory information . Results indicate that self-recognition was better than chance in all conditions and was highest when (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  10.  16
    Bimodal Presentation Speeds up Auditory Processing and Slows Down Visual Processing.Christopher W. Robinson, Robert L. Moore & Thomas A. Crook - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:395363.
    Many situations require the simultaneous processing of auditory and visual information, however, stimuli presented to one sensory modality can sometimes interfere with processing in a second sensory modality (i.e., modality dominance). The current study further investigated modality dominance by examining how task demands and bimodal presentation affect speeded auditory and visual discriminations. Participants in the current study had to quickly determine if two words, two pictures, or two word-picture pairings were the same or different, and we manipulated task (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  18
    Self Beyond the Body: Action-Driven and Task-Relevant Purely Distal Cues Modulate Performance and Body Ownership.Klaudia Grechuta, Laura Ulysse, Belén Rubio Ballester & Paul F. M. J. Verschure - 2019 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13:412150.
    Our understanding of body ownership largely relies on the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) paradigm where synchronous stroking of the real and fake hands leads to an illusion of ownership of RH provided its physical, anatomical, and spatial plausibility. Self-attribution of a fake hand also occurs during visuomotor synchrony, when the visual feedback of self-initiated movements follows the trajectory of the instantiated motor command. In both cases, the experience of ownership is established through bottom-up integration and top-down prediction of multisensory (proximodistal) (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12.  9
    Vocal Cues to Male Physical Formidability.Alvaro Mailhos, Damián Amaro Egea-Caparrós, Cristina Guerrero Rodríguez, Mario Luzardo, Nansi Dilyanova Kiskimska & Francisco Martínez Sánchez - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Animal vocalizations convey important information about the emitter, including sex, age, biological quality, and emotional state. Early on, Darwin proposed that sex differences in auditory signals and vocalizations were driven by sexual selection mechanisms. In humans, studies on the association between male voice attributes and physical formidability have thus far reported mixed results. Hence, with a view to furthering our understanding of the role of human voice in advertising physical formidability, we sought to identify acoustic attributes of male (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  9
    When Visual Cues Do Not Help the Beat: Evidence for a Detrimental Effect of Moving Point-Light Figures on Rhythmic Priming.Anna Fiveash, Birgitta Burger, Laure-Hélène Canette, Nathalie Bedoin & Barbara Tillmann - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Rhythm perception involves strong auditory-motor connections that can be enhanced with movement. However, it is unclear whether just seeing someone moving to a rhythm can enhance auditory-motor coupling, resulting in stronger entrainment. Rhythmic priming studies show that presenting regular rhythms before naturally spoken sentences can enhance grammaticality judgments compared to irregular rhythms or other baseline conditions. The current study investigated whether introducing a point-light figure moving in time with regular rhythms could enhance the rhythmic priming effect. Three experiments (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  14
    Visual Speech Perception Cues Constrain Patterns of Articulatory Variation and Sound Change.Jonathan Havenhill & Youngah Do - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:337534.
    What are the factors that contribute to (or inhibit) diachronic sound change? While acoustically motivated sound changes are well documented, research on the articulatory and audiovisual-perceptual aspects of sound change is limited. This paper investigates the interaction of articulatory variation and audiovisual speech perception in the Northern Cities Vowel Shift (NCVS), a pattern of sound change observed in the Great Lakes region of the United States. We focus specifically on the maintenance of the contrast between the vowels /ɑ/ and /ɔ/, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  19
    Effects of guided exploration on reaching measures of auditory peripersonal space.Mercedes X. Hüg, Fernando Bermejo, Fabián C. Tommasini & Ezequiel A. Di Paolo - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Despite the recognized importance of bodily movements in spatial audition, few studies have integrated action-based protocols with spatial hearing in the peripersonal space. Recent work shows that tactile feedback and active exploration allow participants to improve performance in auditory distance perception tasks. However, the role of the different aspects involved in the learning phase, such as voluntary control of movement, proprioceptive cues, and the possibility of self-correcting errors, is still unclear. We study the effect of guided reaching exploration (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  2
    Difficulties Experienced by Older Listeners in Utilizing Voice Cues for Speaker Discrimination.Yael Zaltz & Liat Kishon-Rabin - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Human listeners are assumed to apply different strategies to improve speech recognition in background noise. Young listeners with normal hearing, e.g., have been shown to follow the voice of a particular speaker based on the fundamental and formant frequencies, which are both influenced by the gender, age, and size of the speaker. However, the auditory and cognitive processes that underlie the extraction and discrimination of these voice cues across speakers may be subject to age-related decline. The present study (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  12
    Listening in the Mix: Lead Vocals Robustly Attract Auditory Attention in Popular Music.Michel Bürgel, Lorenzo Picinali & Kai Siedenburg - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
    Listeners can attend to and track instruments or singing voices in complex musical mixtures, even though the acoustical energy of sounds from individual instruments may overlap in time and frequency. In popular music, lead vocals are often accompanied by sound mixtures from a variety of instruments, such as drums, bass, keyboards, and guitars. However, little is known about how the perceptual organization of such musical scenes is affected by selective attention, and which acoustic features play the most important role. To (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  6
    Effects of Temporal Characteristics on Pilots Perceiving Audiovisual Warning Signals Under Different Perceptual Loads.Xing Peng, Hao Jiang, Jiazhong Yang, Rong Shi, Junyi Feng & Yaowei Liang - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Our research aimed to investigate the effectiveness of auditory, visual, and audiovisual warning signals for capturing the attention of the pilot, and how stimulus onset asynchronies in audiovisual stimuli affect pilots perceiving the bimodal warning signals under different perceptual load conditions. In experiment 1 of the low perceptual load condition, participants discriminated the location of visual targets preceded by five different types of warning signals. In experiment 2 of high perceptual load, participants completed the location task identical to a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  6
    Auditory Processing Differences Correlate With Autistic Traits in Males.Simge Aykan, Emre Gürses, Suna Tokgöz-Yılmaz & Canan Kalaycıoğlu - 2020 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14.
  20.  11
    Effects of Wearing Face Masks While Using Different Speaking Styles in Noise on Speech Intelligibility During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Hoyoung Yi, Ashly Pingsterhaus & Woonyoung Song - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
    The coronavirus pandemic has resulted in the recommended/required use of face masks in public. The use of a face mask compromises communication, especially in the presence of competing noise. It is crucial to measure the potential effects of wearing face masks on speech intelligibility in noisy environments where excessive background noise can create communication challenges. The effects of wearing transparent face masks and using clear speech to facilitate better verbal communication were evaluated in this study. We evaluated listener word identification (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  9
    Similarity space for auditory signals differing in frequency and intensity.Irwin Pollack & Naif Khouri - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (4):209-211.
  22.  56
    Cross-modal Preference Acquisition: Evaluative Conditioning of Pictures by Affective Olfactory and Auditory Cues.Carien M. van Reekum, Helma Vann de Berg & Nico H. Frijda - 1999 - Cognition and Emotion 13 (6):831-836.
  23.  29
    Acquisition of the auditory same/different task in a rhesus monkey.Melissa R. Shyan, Anthony A. Wright, Robert G. Cook & Masako Jitsumori - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (1):1-4.
  24.  57
    Auditory emotional cues enhance visual perception.René Zeelenberg & Bruno R. Bocanegra - 2010 - Cognition 115 (1):202-206.
  25. Auditory intensity changes can cue perception of transformation, accompaniment, or replacement.A. S. Bregman & L. Rousseau - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):476-476.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Auditory processing in severely brain injured patients: Differences between the minimally conscious state and the persistent vegetative state.Melanie Boly, Marie-Elisabeth E. Faymonville & Philippe Peigneux - 2004 - Archives of Neurology 61 (2):233-238.
  27. The multisensory perception of flavor.Malika Auvray & Charles Spence - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (3):1016-1031.
    Following on from ecological theories of perception, such as the one proposed by [Gibson, J. J. . The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin] this paper reviews the literature on the multisensory interactions underlying the perception of flavor in order to determine the extent to which it is really appropriate to consider flavor perception as a distinct perceptual system. We propose that the multisensory perception of flavor may be indicative of the fact that the taxonomy currently used to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  28.  6
    Individual Differences in Categorization Gradience As Predicted by Online Processing of Phonetic Cues During Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence From Eye Movements.Jinghua Ou, Alan C. L. Yu & Ming Xiang - 2021 - Cognitive Science 45 (3):e12948.
    Recent studies have documented substantial variability among typical listeners in how gradiently they categorize speech sounds, and this variability in categorization gradience may link to how listeners weight different cues in the incoming signal. The present study tested the relationship between categorization gradience and cue weighting across two sets of English contrasts, each varying orthogonally in two acoustic dimensions. Participants performed a four‐alternative forced‐choice identification task in a visual world paradigm while their eye movements were monitored. We found that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  18
    Time-of-occurrence cues for "unattended" auditory material.Stuart T. Klapp & Patricia Lee - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (1):176.
  30.  17
    Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks.Michael S. Humphreys, John D. Bain & Ray Pike - 1989 - Psychological Review 96 (2):208-233.
  31.  23
    Individual differences in visual and auditory processing of emotional material.Małgorzata Fajkowska & Anna Zagórska - 2015 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 46 (2):174-180.
    Presented studies investigated the specificity of visual and auditory modalities in attentional processing of emotion, and its association with temperamental dimensions and trait-like attentional control. During preliminary study 30 participants were presented with the paper-pencil visual search task and emotional prosody detection tasks. Results revealed visual happiness superiority and auditory sadness superiority. During the main study, in addition to attentional performance, 51 subjects were administrated two questionnaires: EPQ-R and Attentional Control Scale. Introducing individual differences into analysis limited (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  20
    Auditory and motion metaphors have different scalp distributions: an ERP study.Gwenda L. Schmidt-Snoek, Ashley R. Drew, Elizabeth C. Barile & Stephen J. Agauas - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
  33.  29
    Ear differences and delayed auditory feedback: Effect on a simple verbal repetition task and a nonverbal tapping test.L. D. Roberts & A. H. Gregory - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (2):269.
  34.  17
    Degree of Language Experience Modulates Visual Attention to Visible Speech and Iconic Gestures During Clear and Degraded Speech Comprehension.Linda Drijvers, Julija Vaitonytė & Asli Özyürek - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (10):e12789.
    Visual information conveyed by iconic hand gestures and visible speech can enhance speech comprehension under adverse listening conditions for both native and non‐native listeners. However, how a listener allocates visual attention to these articulators during speech comprehension is unknown. We used eye‐tracking to investigate whether and how native and highly proficient non‐native listeners of Dutch allocated overt eye gaze to visible speech and gestures during clear and degraded speech comprehension. Participants watched video clips of an actress uttering a clear or (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  35.  30
    Individual differences in simple auditory reaction times of hands, feet and jaws.S. H. Seashore & R. H. Seashore - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (4):342.
  36.  5
    Differences Between Young and Older Adults in Working Memory and Performance on the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities†.Larry E. Humes, Gary R. Kidd & Jennifer J. Lentz - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
    The Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities is a battery of auditory-discrimination tasks and speech-identification tasks that has been normed on several hundred young normal-hearing adults. Previous research with the TBAC suggested that cognitive function may impact the performance of older adults. Here, we examined differences in performance on several TBAC tasks between a group of 34 young adults with a mean age of 22.5 years and a group of 115 older adults with a mean age of 69.2 (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  2
    Sex Differences in Attentional Selection Following Gaze and Arrow Cues.Jeanette A. Chacón-Candia, Juan Lupiáñez, Maria Casagrande & Andrea Marotta - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Although the majority of literature has shown undistinguishable attentional effects when eye-gaze and arrows are used as cues, recent research has found that whereas eye-gaze selectively orient attention to the specific location or part of the object looked at, arrows unselectively direct attention towards parts of the environment. However, it is unclear whether this dissociation between gaze and arrow cues is related to social cognitive mechanisms such as the attribution of mental states (Theory of Mind, ToM). We aimed (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  17
    Developmental Differences in Filtering Auditory and Visual Distractors During Visual Selective Attention.Christopher W. Robinson, Andrew M. Hawthorn & Arisha N. Rahman - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
  39.  28
    Developmental Differences Between Children and Adults in the Use of Visual Cues for Segmentation.Ori Lavi-Rotbain & Inbal Arnon - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (S2):606-620.
    Recent work asked if visual cues facilitate word segmentation in adults and infants. While adults showed better word segmentation when presented with a regular visual cue, infants did not. This difference was attributed to infants' lack of understanding that objects have labels. Alternatively, infants’ performance could reflect their difficulty with tracking and integrating multiple multimodal cues. We contrasted these two accounts by looking at the effect of visual cues on word segmentation in adults and across childhood. We (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  40.  19
    Strain differences in simple operant barpress acquisition to an auditory stimulus by rats.Gordon M. Harrington - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (3):163-164.
  41.  4
    Congruent aero-tactile stimuli bias perception of voicing continua.Dolly Goldenberg, Mark K. Tiede, Ryan T. Bennett & D. H. Whalen - 2022 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16:879981.
    Multimodal integration is the formation of a coherent percept from different sensory inputs such as vision, audition, and somatosensation. Most research on multimodal integration in speech perception has focused on audio-visual integration. In recent years, audio-tactile integration has also been investigated, and it has been established that puffs of air applied to the skin and timed with listening tasks shift the perception of voicing by naive listeners. The current study has replicated and extended these findings by testing the effect of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  14
    A difference between auditory and visual apparent movement.Paul A. Kolers - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (5):303-304.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  17
    Ear differences and delayed auditory feedback: Effects on a speech and a music task.John L. Bradshaw, Norman C. Nettleton & Gina Geffen - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (1):85.
  44.  26
    Auditory working memory predicts individual differences in absolute pitch learning.Stephen C. Van Hedger, Shannon L. M. Heald, Rachelle Koch & Howard C. Nusbaum - 2015 - Cognition 140 (C):95-110.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  45.  31
    Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination of intervals in the subsecond and second range.Thomas H. Rammsayer, Natalie Borter & Stefan J. Troche - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  46.  24
    Differences in Attentional Biases to Food Cues between Obese and Healthy Weight Individuals as Measured by a Stroop Task and Electroencephalographic Indices.Hendrikse Joshua, Hayden Melissa & Kothe Emily - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
  47.  61
    Do Auditory Mismatch Responses Differ Between Acoustic Features?HyunJung An, Shing Ho Kei, Ryszard Auksztulewicz & Jan W. H. Schnupp - 2021 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15.
    Mismatch negativity is the electroencephalographic waveform obtained by subtracting event-related potential responses evoked by unexpected deviant stimuli from responses evoked by expected standard stimuli. While the MMN is thought to reflect an unexpected change in an ongoing, predictable stimulus, it is unknown whether MMN responses evoked by changes in different stimulus features have different magnitudes, latencies, and topographies. The present study aimed to investigate whether MMN responses differ depending on whether sudden stimulus change occur in pitch, duration, location or vowel (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  26
    Age Differences in Visual-Auditory Self-Motion Perception during a Simulated Driving Task.Robert Ramkhalawansingh, Behrang Keshavarz, Bruce Haycock, Saba Shahab & Jennifer L. Campos - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  49.  24
    Differences in auditory timing between human and nonhuman primates.Henkjan Honing & Hugo Merchant - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (6):557-558.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  50.  20
    Differences in Speech Recognition Between Children with Attention Deficits and Typically Developed Children Disappear When Exposed to 65 dB of Auditory Noise.Göran B. W. Söderlund & Elisabeth Nilsson Jobs - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000