Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination of intervals in the subsecond and second range

, &
Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01626

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Direct comparisons of auditory and visual durations.Sanford Goldstone & Joyce Levis Goldfarb - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (5):483.
Primary stimulus generalization in discrimination learning as a function of number of trials and incidental cue differences.Leopold O. Walder - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (2):178.
Number or duration discrimination for auditory pulse trains.Irwin Pollack - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):660.
Action, arousal, and subjective time.Kielan Yarrow, Patrick Haggard & John C. Rothwell - 2004 - Consciousness and Cognition 13 (2):373-390.
Sound localization with conflicting visual and auditory cues.H. A. Witkin, S. Wapner & T. Leventhal - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (1):58.
Studies in short-duration auditory fatigue: I. Frequency differences as a function of intensity.J. Donald Harris, Anita I. Rawnsley & Patricia Kelsey - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (6):430.
Auditory discrimination learning in chicks after exposure to auditory and visual stimuli.M. Sosenko Petro, P. J. Capretta & A. J. Cooper - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 12 (5):385-386.
Auditory discrimination in children: The effect of relative and absolute instructions on retention and transfer.Donald A. Riley, John P. Mckee & Donna D. Bell - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (4p1):581.
Short-term retention of visual sequences as a function of stimulus duration and encoding technique.John G. Miscik & Kenneth A. Deffenbacher - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (1):188.
The facilitating effect of strong general illumination upon the discrimination of pitch and intensity differences.G. W. Hartmann - 1934 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 17 (6):813.
Discrimination of intertrial intervals in cross-modal transfer of duration.Warren H. Meck & Russell M. Church - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 19 (4):234-236.
Time-intensity equivalence relations for auditory pulse trains.Irwin Pollack - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):239.
Two-point discrimination in visual space as a function of the temporal interval between the stimuli.Michael Leyzorek - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (5):364.
The effect of certain variables on visual and auditory reaction times.G. Forbes - 1945 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 35 (2):153.
Pitch discrimination as a function of tonal duration.W. W. Turnbull - 1944 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (4):302.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
28 (#553,203)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Discrimination.R. Duncan Luce & Eugene Galanter - 1963 - In D. Luce (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. John Wiley & Sons.. pp. 191-243.
Optimal timing and the Weber function.Peter R. Killeen & Neil A. Weiss - 1987 - Psychological Review 94 (4):455-468.

Add more references