Die Reihe Monographien und Texte zur Nietzsche-Forschung (MTNF) setzt seit mehreren Jahrzehnten die Agenda in der sich stetig verändernden Nietzsche-Forschung. Die Bände sind interdisziplinär und international ausgerichtet und spiegeln das gesamte Spektrum der Nietzsche-Forschung wider, von der Philosophie über die Literaturwissenschaft bis zur politischen Theorie. Die Reihe veröffentlicht Monographien und Sammelbände, die einem strengen Peer-Review-Verfahren unterliegen. Die Buchreihe wird von einem internationalen Redaktionsteam geleitet.

Over the last ten years, „Theory U″, written by C.O. Scharmer in 2007, has earned broad international recognition. However, critical reviews of its grounding in social sciences and philosophy have been rare. After a brief introduction to Theory U this article examines its methodic approach in the context of its references to the universal history of Toynbee, and epistemological sources in the works of Nietzsche, Capra, Varela, Husserl, and Steiner. The investigation of Theory U’s historical and philosophical grounding comes to (...) the conclusion that it is evidently falling short of adequately capturing real world complexity and does not match widely accepted academic standards. Despite its evident deficiencies, Theory U deserves the merit of uniquely embracing non conventional schools of thought beyond the mainstream literature on leadership theories. (shrink)

This article argues that democratic deepening is shaped by shifting civil society-state relations that can only be understood by disaggregating democratic deepening into its component parts of participation, representation, and stateness. This frame is used to explore the divergent democratic trajectories of Brazil, India, and South Africa. Through the examples of local government transformation and social movement mobilization, I argue that a “project” civil society in Brazil has deepened democracy and transformed the state. In contrast, in South Africa and India (...) civil society is increasingly being subordinated to political society. In South Africa, an active civil society has largely been sidelined as a politically consequential actor (containerization) and in India much of civil society has been fragmented and instrumentalized (involution). (shrink)

RésuméĽincorporation?on;un isotope radioactif à une solution nutritive permet de suivre à la trace ľélément absorbé,?on;en distinguer les entrées et les sorties en en dégageant les modalites. Etonna‐ment précise, la méthode a largement comribuéà la mise en évidence des pompes métaboliques qui assurent les transports au travers des membranes biologiques. Mais elle cache des pièges que le spécialiste lui‐même a souvent du mal à déjouer.The inclusion of a radioisotope in a nutrient solution enables us to detect traces of the particular element (...) during the course of its absorption, to distinguish between its entrance and its exit, and to generally clarify some of the mechanisms involved in the process. This surprisingly precise method has contributed extensively to the evidence that transport across biological membranes is mediated by metabolic pumps. However, one should remember that it is strewn with hidden pitfalls which even a specialist is at pains to avoid.ZusammenfassungDas Einschleusen radioaktiver Isotope in eine Nahrlösung erlaubt es, die Fortbewegungen der so aufgenommenen Elemente genau zu verfolgen, deren Eintritt und Austritt zu unterschei‐den und damit den entstehenden Mechanismus zu zeigen. Diese Methode hat viel dazu beigetra‐gen, den Transfer durch biologische Membranen, der von metabolischen Pumpen vollbracht wird, erstaunlich zu veranschaulichen. Jedoch verbirgt sie Fallen, die selbst für den Spezialisten schwer zu entdecken und zu umgehen sind. (shrink)

Drawing on Charles Tilly’s work on inequality, democracy and cities, we explore the local level dynamics of democratization across urban settings in India, South Africa, and Brazil. In all three cases, democratic institutions are consolidated, but there is tremendous variation in the quality of the democratic relationship between cities and their citizens. We follow Tilly’s focus on citizenship as the key element in democratization and argue that explaining variance across our three cases calls for analyzing patterns of inequality through the (...) kind of relational lens used by Tilly and recognizing that patterns of contestation are shaped by shifting political relationships between the nation and the city. We conclude that Tilly’s theoretical frame is nicely sustained by the comparative analysis of cases very different from those that stimulated his original formulations. (shrink)