Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Failures to induce implicit evaluations by means of approach–avoid training.Katrien Vandenbosch & Jan De Houwer - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (7):1311-1330.
    Woud, Becker, and Rinck (2008) asked participants to repeatedly push pictures of certain faces away and to pull pictures of other faces towards them using a joystick. Performance in a subsequent affective priming task showed that previously pulled faces evoked more positive implicit evaluations then previously pushed faces. We report five studies in which we failed to find consistent evidence for the effect of approach–avoid training on implicit evaluations. We also failed to reproduce the effect reported by Woud et al. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs.Andrew K. Solarz - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (4):239.
  • Elaborated contextual framing is necessary for action-based attitude acquisition.Simon M. Laham, Yoshihisa Kashima, Jennifer Dix, Melissa Wheeler & Bianca Levis - 2014 - Cognition and Emotion 28 (6):1119-1126.
  • Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.Bertram Gawronski & Galen V. Bodenhausen - 2006 - Psychological Bulletin 132 (5):692-731.
    A central theme in recent research on attitudes is the distinction between deliberate, "explicit" attitudes and automatic, "implicit" attitudes. The present article provides an integrative review of the available evidence on implicit and explicit attitude change that is guided by a distinction between associative and propositional processes. Whereas associative processes are characterized by mere activation independent of subjective truth or falsity, propositional reasoning is concerned with the validation of evaluations and beliefs. The proposed associative-propositional evaluation model makes specific assumptions about (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   149 citations  
  • Dissociating the effects of attention and contingency awareness on evaluative conditioning effects in the visual paradigm.Andy P. Field & Annette C. Moore - 2005 - Cognition and Emotion 19 (2):217-243.
    Two experiments are described that investigate the effects of attention in moderating evaluative conditioning (EC) effects in a picture‐picture paradigm in which previously discovered experimental artifacts (e.g., Field & Davey, 1999 Field, AP, and Davey, GCL, (1999). Reevaluating evaluative conditioning: A nonassociative explanation of conditioning effects in the visual evaluative conditioning paradigm, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes 25 ((1999)), pp. 211–224.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]) were overcome by counterbalancing conditioned stimuli (CSs) and unconditioned stimuli (USs) (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations