Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Are Automatic Imitation and Spatial Compatibility Mediated by Different Processes?Richard P. Cooper, Caroline Catmur & Cecilia Heyes - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (4):605-630.
    Automatic imitation or “imitative compatibility” is thought to be mediated by the mirror neuron system and to be a laboratory model of the motor mimicry that occurs spontaneously in naturalistic social interaction. Imitative compatibility and spatial compatibility effects are known to depend on different stimulus dimensions—body movement topography and relative spatial position. However, it is not yet clear whether these two types of stimulus–response compatibility effect are mediated by the same or different cognitive processes. We present an interactive activation model (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Social top-down response modulation (STORM): a model of the control of mimicry in social interaction.Yin Wang & Antonia F. De C. Hamilton - 2012 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6.
  • Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Richard M. Shiffrin & Walter Schneider - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (2):128-90.
    Tested the 2-process theory of detection, search, and attention presented by the current authors in a series of experiments. The studies demonstrate the qualitative difference between 2 modes of information processing: automatic detection and controlled search; trace the course of the learning of automatic detection, of categories, and of automatic-attention responses; and show the dependence of automatic detection on attending responses and demonstrate how such responses interrupt controlled processing and interfere with the focusing of attention. The learning of categories is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   800 citations  
  • How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.Seth Roberts & Harold Pashler - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (2):358-367.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   86 citations  
  • Dissociating ideomotor and spatial compatibility: Empirical evidence and connectionist models.Ty W. Boyer, Matthias Scheutz & Bennett I. Bertenthal - 2009 - In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp. 2280--2285.