How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing

&
Psychological Review 107 (2):358-367 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.358

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Theory development should begin (but not end) with good empirical fits: A comment on Roberts and Pashler (2000).Joseph Lee Rodgers & David C. Rowe - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (3):599-603.
How To Saw The Concept of Attention In Half Without Sacrificing the Subject: Review of The Psychology of Attention by Harold Pashler. [REVIEW]Simon Moss - 1999 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 5.
Postscript: Theory development should not end (but always begins) with good empirical fits: Response to Roberts and Pashler's (2002) reply.Joseph Lee Rodgers & David C. Rowe - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (3):603-604.
Testing the invariance of relative timing: Comment on Gentner (1987).Herbert Heuer - 1988 - Psychological Review 95 (4):552-557.
Review : Richard H. Roberts and James M. M. Good (eds) The Recovery of Rhetoric: Persuasive Discourse and Disciplinarity in the Human Sciences. Charlottesville/London: University Press of Virginia, 1993. xii + 278 pp. [REVIEW]Richard Harvey Brown - 1995 - History of the Human Sciences 8 (3):143-144.
Testing mixture models of transitive preference: Comment on Regenwetter, Dana, and Davis-Stober (2011).Michael H. Birnbaum - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (4):675-683.
Review of: Major, John S., Sarah A. Queen, Andrew Seth Meyer, and Harold D. Roth (translators and editors), The Huainanzi, A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Government in Early Han China of Liu An, King of Huainan, New York: Columbia University Press, 2010, xi + 986 pages and Major, John S., Sarah A. Queen, Andrew Seth Meyer, and Harold D. Roth (translators and editors), The Essential Huainanzi of L iu An, King of Huainan, New York: Columbia University Press, 2012, vii + 252 pages. [REVIEW]James D. Sellmann - 2013 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (2):267-270.
Norman and Sigmund: Comment on Denzin's "Harold and Agnes".Richard A. Hilbert - 1991 - Sociological Theory 9 (2):264-268.
What must a psychological theory of reasoning explain? Comment on Barrouillet, Gauffroy, and Lecas (2008).Klaus Oberauer & Mike Oaksford - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (3):773-778.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
43 (#405,068)

6 months
14 (#339,756)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The generalizability crisis.Tal Yarkoni - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e1.

View all 79 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
The methodology of scientific research programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1978 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions.Philip Kitcher - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (3):929-932.

View all 18 references / Add more references