Journal of Business Ethics 149 (2):313-332 (2018)

This study investigates the antecedents and mechanisms of consumers’ adoption of a public bicycle-sharing scheme as a form of shared sustainable consumption. Drawing on marketing ethics and sustainability literature, it argues that cultural and consumption values drive or deter the adoption of PBSS through the mediating mechanism of ethical evaluation. This study tests its hypotheses using a sample of 755 consumers from one of the largest PBSS programs in China. The results confirm the significance of collectivism, man–nature orientation, materialism, and face-consciousness as key determinants of the adoption of PBSS. Interestingly, these values play mixed roles in influencing PBSS adoption. It also finds that such values and beliefs need to be effectively translated into ethical evaluations of PBSS adoption, and need to be addressed in the specific social context. Thus, ethical evaluation constitutes a cognitive strategy that allows consumers to justify and defend their adoption of sustainability practices. The results suggest that a desirable sustainability program needs to not only cater to the cultural and psychological motivations of consumers, but also reflect the social norms and social context in which the sustainability practices and consumers are embedded.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-016-3043-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Shared Values, Social Unity, and Liberty.Margaret P. Gilbert - 2005 - Public Affairs Quarterly 19 (1):25-49.
Qualities of Sharing and Their Transformations in the Digital Age.Andreas Wittel - 2011 - International Review of Information Ethics 15 (9):2011.
Openness in the Social Sciences: Sharing Data.Joan E. Sieber - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (2):69 – 86.
Sharing Food, Sharing Values: Mothering and Empathy in Murik Society.Kathleen Barlow - 2010 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 38 (4):339-353.
The Self-Dual Serial Cost-Sharing Rule.M. J. Albizuri - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (4):555-567.
Some Challenges to a Religious Global Ethics in an Increasingly Secularized World.John Raymaker - 2011 - In Shanta Premawardhana Ariane Hentsch Cisneros (ed.), Sharing Values. Geneva: Series No. 4. pp. 345-362.
What Should Be the Data Sharing Policy of Cognitive Science?Mark A. Pitt & Yun Tang - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):214-221.
Insights From Ifaluk: Food Sharing Among Cooperative Fishers.Richard Sosis - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):568-569.
Sharing Food, Sharing Values: Mothering and Empathy in Murik Society.Kathleen Barlow - 2010 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 38 (4):339-353.


Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #318,163 of 2,519,667 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,667 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes