Felix Noeggerath on Kant: Transcendental Synthesis as a Principle of System Formation

RUDN Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):598-613 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Walter Benjamin called Felix Noeggerath (1885-1960) the “universal genius” or simply “genius.” In his 1916 treatise “Synthesis and the Concept of System in Philosophy,” Noeggerath offered a reading of Kant’s concept of synthesis in an original and radical manner. He dares to confront thought with the incommensurability of atheoretical Being. The linkage between logic and incommensurability is what he calls rationalism. In contradiction to this claim, any attempt to exclude atheoretical Being from the realm of logic is anti-rationalism. Noeggerath elaborates on this in a penetrating discussion and modification of epistemological positions, especially those of the Marburg School and Hermann Cohen. Noeggerath constructs a notion of the philosophical system with the help of Kant’s three tables of transcendental judgements, categories, and principles in the Critique of Pure Reason. Each of these tables is known to contain 12 individual elements in four groups of three each. For the systematic division, the third group under the title “Relation” is decisive. Noeggerath assigns one systemic part to each kind of relation: “For it is to be connected: the categorical relation with ethics, the hypothetical with logic, and the disjunctive with aesthetics.” As a result the classical sequence, beginning with logic, is changed. “The order of the limbs is: a) ethics, b) logic, c) aesthetics.” In Noeggerath’s logical outline, specific mathematical concepts of meta-geometry play a decisive role. According to him, philosophy can resemble their preciseness in building a viable concept of the infinite. The prerequisite is that philosophy does not itself behave mathematically but proceeds along its own path in critical distance to the “specialized, act-kindred thinking” of the mathematician.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Problem ugruntowania filozofii w doktrynie H. Cohena.Andrzej Noras - 2017 - Studia Z Historii Filozofii 7 (4):63-85.
Cohen Hermann.Зинаида Сокулер - 2021 - Philosophical Anthropology 7 (2):211-238.
The Place of Logic in Kant's Philosophy.Clinton Tolley - 2017 - In Matthew C. Altman (ed.), The Palgrave Kant Handbook. London: Palgrave. pp. 165-87.
Kant, Hegel, and the System of Pure Reason.Karin de Boer - 2011 - In Elena Ficara (ed.), Die Begründung der Philosophie im Deutschen Idealismus. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann. pp. 77-87.
Hermann Cohen’s Madal-Categories. 서정욱 - 2018 - Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 85:127-144.
A interpretação externalista de Kant.André Klaudat - 1999 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 3 (1):101-138.
Immanuel Kant: Logic.Srećko Kovač - 2020 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kant's Argument for the Apperception Principle.Melissa McBay Merritt - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):59-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-27

Downloads
9 (#1,256,605)

6 months
7 (#435,412)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references