From art to science: a new epistemological status for medicine? On expectations regarding personalized medicine

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (4):457-466 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Personalized medicine plays an important role in the development of current medicine. Among the numerous statements regarding the future of personalized medicine, some can be found that accord medicine a new scientific status. Medicine will be transformed from an art to a science due to personalized medicine. This prognosis is supported by references to models of historical developments. The article examines what is meant by this prognosis, what consequences it entails, and how feasible it is. It refers to the long tradition of epistemological thinking in medicine and the use of historical models for the development of medicine. The possible answers to the question “art or science” are systematized with respect to the core question about the relationship between knowledge and action. The prediction for medicine to develop from an ‘empirical healing art’ to a ‘rational, molecular science’ is nonsensical from an epistemological point of view. The historical models employed to substantiate the development of personalized medicine are questionable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Between hype and hope: What is really at stake with personalized medicine?Camille Abettan - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (3):423-430.
Ethical Considerations in Personalized Medicine.Smit Patel, Chris Slavin & Raj R. Rao - 2020 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 11 (1):89-93.
Neither from words, nor from visions: understanding p-medicine from innovative treatments.Maël Lemoine - 2017 - Lato Sensu, Revue de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences 4 (2):12-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-23

Downloads
33 (#500,033)

6 months
6 (#588,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

La médecine et ses humanismes.Juliette Ferry-Danini & Élodie Giroux - 2020 - Archives de Philosophie 83 (4):5-12.
Theranostics: is it really a revolution? Evaluating a new term in medicine.Urban Wiesing - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (4):593-597.
Precision in health care.Henk ten Have & Bert Gordijn - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (4):441-442.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Nicomachean ethics. Aristotle - 1999 - New York: Clarendon Press. Edited by Michael Pakaluk. Translated by Michael Pakaluk.
Why medicine cannot be a science.Ronald Munson - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (2):183-208.

View all 16 references / Add more references