- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Do patients want their families or their doctors to make treatment decisions in the event of incapacity, and why?
AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (4):251-259 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Medical mismanagement or public vacillation?P. N. Bamford - 1981 - Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (4):179-181.
A new method for making treatment decisions for incapacitated patients: what do patients think about the use of a patient preference predictor?David Wendler, Bob Wesley, Mark Pavlick & Annette Rid - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (4):235-241.
The self-fulfilling prophecy in intensive care.Dominic Wilkinson - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (6):401-410.
The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative study.Laura Sheard, Hayley Prout, Dawn Dowding, Simon Noble, Ian Watt, Anthony Maraveyas & Miriam Johnson - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):22.
Participation of French general practitioners in end-of-life decisions for their hospitalised patients.E. Ferrand, P. Jabre, S. Fernandez-Curiel, F. Morin, C. Vincent-Genod, P. Duvaldestin, F. Lemaire, C. Herve & J. Marty - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (12):683-687.
Ethically Optimal Interventions with Impaired Patients.Edmund G. Howe - 2014 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 25 (1):3-12.
The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life - the perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative study. [REVIEW]Laura Sheard, Hayley Prout, Dawn Dowding, Simon Noble, Ian Watt, Anthony Maraveyas & Miriam Johnson - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):22-.
Unanswered Questions Surrounding the Patient Self–Determination Act.Robyn Shapiro - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (2):117.
How do nursing home doctors involve patients and next of kin in end-of-life decisions? A qualitative study from Norway.Maria Romøren, Reidar Pedersen & Reidun Førde - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):1-8.
Nationaler Bericht der europäischen Befragung: „Doctors' views on the management of patients in persistent vegetative state (PVS)“ im Rahmen des Forschungsprojekts „The moral and legal issues surrounding the treatment and health care of patients in persistent vegetative state“. [REVIEW]D. Lanzerath, Ludger Honnefelder & Ulrich Feeser - 1998 - Ethik in der Medizin 10 (3):152-180.
Courts as communicators: Can doctors learn from judges' decisions?: The doctor's question: ‘Will I be all right if I …? [REVIEW]Loane Skene - 2004 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1 (1):49-56.
Withholding life prolonging treatment, and self deception.G. M. Sayers - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6):347-352.
Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: commentary 1: CPR and the cost of autonomy.Robin Gill - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (5):317-318.
Truth telling, autonomy and the role of metaphor.D. Kirklin - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):11-14.
Use of a Patient Preference Predictor to Help Make Medical Decisions for Incapacitated Patients.A. Rid & D. Wendler - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):104-129.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-10-27
Downloads
20 (#763,203)
6 months
5 (#625,196)
2017-10-27
Downloads
20 (#763,203)
6 months
5 (#625,196)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
The Patient preference predictor and the objection from higher-order preferences.Jakob Thrane Mainz - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (3):221-222.
Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor.E. J. Jardas, David Wasserman & David Wendler - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (5):304-310.
AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care.Nikola Biller-Andorno, Andrea Ferrario, Susanne Joebges, Tanja Krones, Federico Massini, Phyllis Barth, Georgios Arampatzis & Michael Krauthammer - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (3):175-183.
Patients’ Priorities for Surrogate Decision-Making: Possible Influence of Misinformed Beliefs.E. J. Jardas, Robert Wesley, Mark Pavlick, David Wendler & Annette Rid - 2022 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 13 (3):137-151.
The Theory and Practice of Surrogate Decision‐Making.David Wendler - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (1):29-31.
References found in this work
Deciding for Others.Gerald Dworkin, Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (162):118.
Autonomy and the Family as (In)Appropriate Surrogates for DNR Decisions: A Qualitative Analysis of Dying Cancer Patients’ Talk.Jaklin Ardath Eliott & Ian N. Olver - 2007 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 18 (3):206-218.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-b9rvg uwo