Medical mismanagement or public vacillation?

Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (4):179-181 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ian Kennedy extols the virtues of self-determination by patients: they should make their own decisions about medical treatment after being given advice by their doctors; for doctors to make such decisions on their patients' behalf is authoritarian and unacceptable (I). I present a case where, despite thorough consultation and counselling, the decisions made by the patient and supported by her doctors were found to be consistently inappropriate to her changing lifestyle

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A property right to medical care.Dayna Bowen Matthew & Mark Earnest - 2008 - Journal of Legal Medicine 29 (1):65-80.
Equity and public health care in china.Ren-Zong Qiu - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):283-287.
Medical ethics and the law: implications for public policy.Marc D. Hiller (ed.) - 1981 - Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Pub. Co..
The limits of medical practice.Ingemar Nordin - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):105-123.
Law and medical ethics.J. K. Mason - 1991 - London: LexisNexis UK. Edited by Alexander McCall Smith & G. T. Laurie.
The extent of public interest in medical-ethical-legal problems.B. Towers - 1980 - Journal of Medical Ethics 6 (4):202-204.
Truth-telling in medical care.Ronald M. Green - 1981 - In Marc D. Hiller (ed.), Medical ethics and the law: implications for public policy. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Pub. Co..

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
39 (#398,894)

6 months
12 (#200,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references