Llull and Leibniz: The Logic of Discovery

Catalan Review 4:75-83 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Llull and Leibniz both subscribed to conceptual atomism: the belief that the majority of concepts are compounds constructed from a relatively small number of primitive concepts. Llull worked out techniques for finding the logically possible combinations of his primitives, but Leibniz criticized Llull’s execution of these techniques. This article argues that Leibniz was right about things being more complicated than Llull thought but that he was wrong about the details. The paper attempts to correct these details.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ideal Language.Steven Laporte - forthcoming - Knowledge Organization.
Gottfried Withelm Leibniz y Raimundo Llull.Erhard Platzeck - 1972 - Studia Lulliana 16 (2-3):129-193.
The spiritual logic of Ramon Llull.Mark David Johnston - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Doctor Illuminatus: A Ramon Llull Reader.Ramón Llull - 1993 - Princeton University Press.
Apuntes sobre el pensamiento matemático de Ramón Llull.John R. Welch - 1989 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 4 (2):451-459.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-13

Downloads
861 (#18,561)

6 months
162 (#24,957)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John R. Welch
Saint Louis University - Madrid Campus

Citations of this work

Kant and Aristotle: Epistemology, Logic, and Method.Marco Sgarbi - 2016 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references