An eliminativist theory of religion

Sophia 48 (1):35-42 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A philosophical theory of religion ought to meet four criteria: it should be extensionally accurate, neutral, phenomenological, and non-circular. I argue that none of the popular theories of religion meet all these criteria, and that, in particular, the extensional accuracy criterion and the non-circularity criterion can’t be met without sacrificing extensional accuracy. I conclude that, therefore, religions do not form a kind, and so, there is no such thing as religion.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,912

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

54 (#229,612)

6 months
1 (#479,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Webb
Texas Tech University

Citations of this work

Religious conversion, philosophy, and social science.Oliver Thomas Spinney - forthcoming - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-11.

Add more citations