On Sober's Criterion of Contrastive Testability

Abstract

Elliott Sober has suggested his criterion of contrastive testability as an improvement over previous criteria of empirical significance like falsifiability. I argue that his criterion renders almost any theory empirically significant because its restrictions on auxiliary assumptions are to weak. Even when the criterion is modified to avoid this trivialization, it fails to meet other conditions of adequacy for a criterion of empirical significance that follow from Sober's position. I suggest to define empirical significance as empirical non-equivalence to a tautology, because this definition does meet the conditions of adequacy. Specifically, it is equivalent to the standard Bayesian criterion of empirical significance whenever all probabilities are defined and contains falsifiability as a special case. This latter feature is important because those conditions of adequacy that apply to criteria of deductive empirical significance single out falsifiability.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Carnap on Empirical Significance.Sebastian Lutz - 2017 - Synthese 194 (1):217-252.
Relevant consequence and empirical inquiry.Daniel N. Osherson & Scott Weinstein - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (4):437 - 448.
A Welcome Dialogue On Empirical Issues:reply To Commentaries On Baars On Contrastive Analysis.Bernard Baars - 1994 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 1.
What is the Verifiability Criterion a Criterion of?Stuart Brown - 1975 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 9:137-153.
Recent Work on Criteria for Event Identity, 1967-1979.Michael Bradie - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:29-77.
Cerebral death.Eike-Henner W. Kluge - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2).
Objectivity and truth in history.J. L. Gorman - 1974 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 17 (1-4):373 – 397.
In Search of Opacity.Antonio K. Chu - 1990 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
On Ontology.Yvonne Raley - 2004 - Dissertation, City University of New York

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-07

Downloads
35 (#443,848)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Language, truth and logic.Alfred Jules Ayer - 1936 - London,: V. Gollancz.
The aim and structure of physical theory.Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem - 1954 - Princeton,: Princeton University Press.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.

View all 42 references / Add more references