Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (3):309-315 (2015)
AbstractAmongst traditionally-available frameworks within which end-of-life decisions in Intensive Care Units are situated, we favour Ordinary versus Extra-ordinary care distinctions as the most helpful. Predicated on this framework, we revisit the concepts of personhood and autonomy. We argue that a full account of personhood locates its foundation in relationships with others, rather than merely in “rationality”. A full account of autonomy also recognises relationships with others, as well as the actual reality of the patient’s situation-in-the-world. The fact that, when critically ill, the patient may no longer be able to take an active role in decision-making does not bring about the end of their personhood, or of their autonomy. Because the patient’s autonomy is intimately linked to their relationships with others, once critical illness supervenes, respect for their autonomy devolves to those others with whom the patient is in relationship. In practical application, this means that there must be a dialogue, as the end-of-life of the critically-ill patient in ICU comes into view. Such dialogue should be grounded on this understanding in order to conform best to moral philosophical principles. Ideally the dialogue will involve all those with whom the patient is in relationship and, practical difficulties within an ICU notwithstanding, will aim to be inclusive, non-coercive and reflective as it seeks to maximise the good of the patient in their unique context.
Similar books and articles
Attitudes to End-of-Life Decisions in Paediatric Intensive Care.Aslihan Akpinar, Muesser Ozcan Senses & Rahime Aydin Er - 2009 - Nursing Ethics 16 (1):83-92.
Critical care ethics in Hong Kong: Cross-cultural conflicts as east meets west.F. Cheng, Mary Ip, K. K. Wong & W. W. Yan - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (6):616 – 627.
The role of advance directives in end-of-life decisions in Austria: survey of intensive care physicians. [REVIEW]Eva Schaden, Petra Herczeg, Stefan Hacker, Andrea Schopper & Claus G. Krenn - 2010 - BMC Medical Ethics 11 (1):1-6.
Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care.Mary Ann Baily - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):172-182.
'End-of-life' decision making within intensive care - objective, consistent, defensible?A. J. Ravenscroft - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):435-440.
Disability, discrimination and death: is it justified to ration life saving treatment for disabled newborn infants?Dominic Wilkinson & Julian Savulescu - unknown
Turkish nurses' decision making in the distribution of intensive care beds.Nermin Ersoy & Aslihan Akpinar - 2010 - Nursing Ethics 17 (1):87-98.
Which newborn infants are too expensive to treat? Camosy and rationing in intensive care.Dominic Wilkinson - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):502-506.
Withholding hydration and nutrition in newborns.Nicolas Porta & Joel Frader - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):443-451.
A Costly Separation Between Withdrawing and Withholding Treatment in Intensive Care.Dominic Wilkinson & Julian Savulescu - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (3):127-137.
Nurses' autonomy in end-of-life situations in intensive care units.Maria Cristina Paganini & Regina Szylit Bousso - 2015 - Nursing Ethics 22 (7):803-814.
Predicting the future for newborns requiring intensive care.Lu-Ann Papile - 1994 - Human Nature 5 (1):95-102.
‘Self-care without a self’: Alzheimer’s disease and the concept of personal responsibility for health. [REVIEW]Ursula Naue - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (3):315-324.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Relational autonomy: what does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature.Carlos Gómez-Vírseda, Yves de Maeseneer & Chris Gastmans - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):1-15.
Phenomenology of the Locked-In Syndrome: an Overview and Some Suggestions.Fernando Vidal - 2018 - Neuroethics 13 (2):119-143.
Customizable Ethics Settings for Building Resilience and Narrowing the Responsibility Gap: Case Studies in the Socio-Ethical Engineering of Autonomous Systems.Sadjad Soltanzadeh, Jai Galliott & Natalia Jevglevskaja - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2693-2708.
References found in this work
Imagining oneself otherwise.Catriona Mackenzie - 2000 - In Catriona Mackenzie & Natalie Stoljar (eds.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oup Usa.
Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy.N. Stoljar - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):375-384.
Possibilities of consensus: Toward democratic moral discourse.Bruce Jennings - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):447-463.
Committees and consensus: How many heads are better than one?Peter Caws - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):375-391.