In the Privacy of Our Streets

In Bryce Newell, Tjerk Timan & Bert-Jaap Koops (eds.), Surveillance, Privacy and Public Space. pp. 16-32 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


If one lives in a city and wants to be by oneself or have a private conversation with someone else, there are two ways to set about it: either one finds a place of solitude, such as one’s bedroom, or one finds a place crowded enough, public enough, that attention to each person dilutes so much so as to resemble a deserted refuge. Often, one can get more privacy in public places than in the most private of spaces. The home is not always the ideal place to find privacy. Neighbours snoop, children ask questions, and family members judge. When the home suffocates privacy, the only escape is to go out, to the coffee shop, the public square. For centuries, city streets have been the true refuges of the solitaries, the overwhelmed, and the underprivileged. Yet time and again we hear people arguing that we do not have any claim to privacy while on the streets because they are part of the so-called public sphere. The main objective of this chapter is to argue that privacy belongs as much in the streets as it does in the home.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Privacy and Hypocrisy.John William Devine - 2011 - Journal of Media Law 3 (2):169-177.
Privacy and the public/private dichotomy.Simon Dawes - 2011 - Thesis Eleven 107 (1):115-124.
Privacy and Punishment.Mark Tunick - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (4):643-668.
Privacy.Edmund Byrne - 1998 - In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 649-659.
New Ways of Thinking about Privacy.B. Roessler - 2006 - In Anne Philips Bonnie Honig & John Dryzek (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 694-713.
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Privacy Expectations at Work—What is Reasonable and Why?Elin Palm - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):201-215.
Public/Private.Paul Fairfield - 2005 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Privacies: philosophical evaluations.Beate Rössler (ed.) - 2004 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.


Added to PP

1,194 (#7,783)

6 months
109 (#19,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carissa Véliz
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why privacy is important.James Rachels - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.
What Is the Right to Privacy?Andrei Marmor - 2015 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (1):3-26.
Concealment and Exposure.Thomas Nagel - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1):3-30.
Privacy.Barrington Moore - 1986 - Ethics 96 (3):646-647.

Add more references