Privacy Expectations at Work—What is Reasonable and Why?

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):201-215 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Throughout the longstanding debate on privacy, the concept has been framed in various ways. Most often it has been discussed as an area within which individuals rightfully may expect to be left alone and in terms of certain data that they should be entitled to control. The sphere in which individuals should be granted freedom from intrusion has typically been equated with the indisputably private domestic sphere. Privacy claims in the semi-public area of work have not been sufficiently investigated. In this article, the case is made that employees have reasonable expectations on privacy at work. Firstly, in a descriptive analysis, employees’ need for workspace privacy is spelt out. Secondly, a normative analysis explicates the reasons why privacy should be protected. The main thrust is to provide a more inclusive privacy concept and hence, a more adequate basis for privacy protection legislation and codes in the area of work. Contrary to prevailing workplace privacy protection, employees’ need for local privacy should be accommodated as well as informational privacy.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,554

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reasonable expectations of privacy.Robert L. McArthur - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):123-128.
Securing privacy at work: The importance of contextualized consent. [REVIEW]Elin Palm - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):233-241.
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Privacy and Intimacy.David Elliott & Eldon Soifer - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (4):489-497.
The moral obligation to obey law.Mark Tunick - 2002 - Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (3):464–482.
The Ontology of Privacy.Leilani Anne Roberts - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Oregon
Privacy, democracy, and security.Annabelle Lever - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 63:99-105.
Recent work on evolution and social contract ethics.John Mizzoni - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (3):377-388.


Added to PP

180 (#90,972)

6 months
5 (#192,994)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elin Palm
Linkoping University

Citations of this work

Privacy and social interaction.Beate Roessler & Dorota Mokrosinska - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (8):771-791.
Securing privacy at work: The importance of contextualized consent. [REVIEW]Elin Palm - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):233-241.
Codes of ethics in the light of fairness and harm.Dan Munter - 2013 - Business Ethics: A European Review 22 (2):174-188.
An interactive ethical assessment of surveillance‐capable software within the home‐help service sector.Elin Palm - 2013 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 11 (1):43-68.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Shame and Necessity.Bernard Arthur Owen Williams - 1992 - University of California Press.
Why privacy is important.James Rachels - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.
Shame and Necessity.Bernard Williams - 1993 - Philosophy 69 (270):507-509.

View all 27 references / Add more references