Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):201-215 (2009)

Authors
Elin Palm
Linkoping University
Abstract
Throughout the longstanding debate on privacy, the concept has been framed in various ways. Most often it has been discussed as an area within which individuals rightfully may expect to be left alone and in terms of certain data that they should be entitled to control. The sphere in which individuals should be granted freedom from intrusion has typically been equated with the indisputably private domestic sphere. Privacy claims in the semi-public area of work have not been sufficiently investigated. In this article, the case is made that employees have reasonable expectations on privacy at work. Firstly, in a descriptive analysis, employees’ need for workspace privacy is spelt out. Secondly, a normative analysis explicates the reasons why privacy should be protected. The main thrust is to provide a more inclusive privacy concept and hence, a more adequate basis for privacy protection legislation and codes in the area of work. Contrary to prevailing workplace privacy protection, employees’ need for local privacy should be accommodated as well as informational privacy.
Keywords Philosophy   Ontology   Political Philosophy   Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-008-9129-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Shame and Necessity.Bernard Arthur Owen Williams - 1992 - University of California Press.
Why Privacy is Important.James Rachels - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.
The Economics of Justice.Richard A. Posner (ed.) - 1981 - Harvard University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Privacy and Social Interaction.Beate Roessler & Dorota Mokrosinska - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (8):771-791.
Codes of Ethics in the Light of Fairness and Harm.Dan Munter - 2013 - Business Ethics: A European Review 22 (2):174-188.
Securing Privacy at Work: The Importance of Contextualized Consent. [REVIEW]Elin Palm - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):233-241.
An Interactive Ethical Assessment of Surveillance‐Capable Software Within the Home‐Help Service Sector.Elin Palm - 2013 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 11 (1):43-68.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reasonable Expectations of Privacy.Robert L. McArthur - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):123-128.
Securing Privacy at Work: The Importance of Contextualized Consent. [REVIEW]Elin Palm - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):233-241.
Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Privacy and Intimacy.David Elliott & Eldon Soifer - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (4):489-497.
The Moral Obligation to Obey Law.Mark Tunick - 2002 - Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (3):464–482.
The Ontology of Privacy.Leilani Anne Roberts - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Oregon
Privacy, Democracy, and Security.Annabelle Lever - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 63:99-105.
Recent Work on Evolution and Social Contract Ethics.John Mizzoni - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (3):377-388.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
165 ( #71,984 of 2,518,088 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #272,129 of 2,518,088 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes