- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Understanding Inconsistent Science
Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (2013)
Abstract
Peter Vickers examines 'inconsistent theories' in the history of science--theories which, though contradictory, are held to be extremely useful. He argues that these 'theories' are actually significantly different entities, and warns that the traditional goal of philosophy to make substantial, general claims about how science works is misguidedAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Peter Vickers: Understanding Inconsistent Science. [REVIEW]Bryson Brown - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (2):413-418.
Peter Vickers: Understanding inconsistent science. [REVIEW]Mathias Frisch - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3):913-918.
Understanding Inconsistent Science. [REVIEW]Zanja Yudell - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (261):876-878.
VICKERS, Peter, Understanding Inconsistent Science, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. [REVIEW]Miquel Maria Molina Oltra - 2015 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 66:180-183.
‘Understanding Inconsistent Science’, by Vickers, Peter: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. xi + 273, £40 (hardback). [REVIEW]Paul Dicken - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):609-611.
Peter Vickers: Understanding Inconsistent Science: Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013, 288 pp, £40.00, ISBN: 978-0-19-969202-6. [REVIEW]Bryson Brown - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (2):413-418.
Eliminating inconsistency in science: Peter Vickers: Understanding inconsistent science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, xii+273pp, £30.00 HB.Mark P. Newman - 2014 - Metascience 24 (1):49-53.
Just the facts ma'am: some concerns about the identification of future-proof science: Peter Vickers: Identifying future-proof science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, 288 pp, £72 HB. [REVIEW]Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2023 - Metascience 33 (1):5-10.
Peter Vickers, "Identifying Future-Proof Science.".Glenn Branch - 2024 - Philosophy in Review 44 (1):55-58.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-26
Downloads
33 (#500,650)
6 months
4 (#862,833)
2014-01-26
Downloads
33 (#500,650)
6 months
4 (#862,833)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
String Theory, Non-Empirical Theory Assessment, and the Context of Pursuit.Frank Cabrera - 2021 - Synthese 198:3671–3699.
Going local: a defense of methodological localism about scientific realism.Jamin Asay - 2019 - Synthese 196 (2):587-609.
Scientific Theories.Hans Halvorson - 2014 - In Paul Humphreys (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 585-608.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-x7cz5 uwo