Argumentation 25 (2):141-161 (2011)

‘In Context’ is aimed at giving contextualization its rightful place in the study of argumentation. First, Frans H. van Eemeren explains the crucial role of context in a reconstructive analysis of argumentative discourse. He distinguishes four levels of contextualization. Second, he situates his approach to context in the field of argumentation studies by comparing it with Walton’s approach. He emphasizes the importance of distinguishing clearly between a normatively motivated theoretical ideal model and empirically-based communicative activity types. Third, van Eemeren concentrates on the ‘macro-level’ of contextualization: contextualization in institutionalized communicative activity types. He makes clear that the macro-context of a communicative activity type can be characterized argumentatively by describing the disctinctive features of the empirical counterparts of the four stages of a critical discussion in the activity type concerned. Fourth, he points out what the consequences of the macrocontextualization of argumentative discourse in a certain communicative activity type are for the strategic maneuvering that may takes place and the identification of fallacies as derailments of strategic maneuvering. Fifth, van Eemeren draws some general conclusions regarding the role of contextualization in the analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse
Keywords Communicative activity type  Context  Contextualization  Fallacy as derailment of strategic maneuvering  Reconstructive analysis  Strategic maneuvering
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9211-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ad Hominem Arguments.Douglas Walton - 1998 - University Alabama Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Analyzing Dialogue Moves in Chronic Care Communication.Fabrizio Macagno & Sarah Bigi - 2020 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 9 (2):167-198.
Considering the Roles of Values in Practical Reasoning Argumentation Evaluation.Michael D. Baumtrog - 2013 - Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA).

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Evaluating Argumentative Moves in Medical Consultations.Sarah Bigi - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):51-65.


Added to PP index

Total views
48 ( #236,187 of 2,508,059 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,508,059 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes