Abstract
It is argued that Pettit’s conception of “contestatory democracy” is superior to deliberative, direct and epistemic democracy. The strong and weak points of these conceptions are discussed drawing upon the work of a.o Bruce Bimber. It is further argued that ‘contestation’ and ‘information’ are highly relevant notions in thinking about, just, viable and sustainable design for E-democracy.
Keywords E-democracy  deliberative democracy  internet  contestatory democracy  digital democracy  E-voting  Philip Pettit  Bruce Bimber
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-005-4581-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Breaking the Filter Bubble: Democracy and Design.Engin Bozdag & Jeroen van den Hoven - 2015 - Ethics and Information Technology 17 (4):249-265.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
63 ( #181,421 of 2,506,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes