Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (7):619-635 (2013)

This article focuses on Max Horkheimer’s criticism of Husserl’s phenomenology in basic philosophical matters such as method, theory, logic, truth, metaphysics, etc. Horkheimer objects to Husserl’s conception of philosophy as a mathesis universalis and of science as relativistic research. However, he finds Husserl’s criticism of scientific rationalism the most important step for the legitimacy of philosophy. According to him, Husserl’s method is intended to be a science of apriority. But his understanding of apriority is static, is radically abstract, and overlooks the dialectical relation. Therefore, his method is ahistorical and undialectical. Horkheimer does not interpret Husserl’s idealism in the sense of classical idealism. However, he believes that the positivistic and Cartesian implications in Husserl’s philosophy made his method less fruitful in concrete situations. Consequently, he calls Husserl’s phenomenology abstract positivism, traditional theory and a bourgeois ideology. Horkheimer’s critique focuses on Husserl’s early period of phenomenology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453713491234
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy as Rigorous Science.Edmund Husserl - 2002 - New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 2:249-295.
The Social Function of Philosophy.Max Horkheimer - 1999 - Filozofia 54 (2):114-125.
The Social Function of Philosophy.Max Horkheimer - 1972 - Radical Philosophy 3:10.
Art and Mass Culture.Max Horkheimer - 1941 - Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 9 (2):290-304.
Truth Matters: Heidegger and Horkheimer in Dialectical Disclosure.Lambert Zuidervaart - 2008 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2008 (145):131-160.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology.Paul Ricœur - 1967 - Northwestern University Press.
Husserl’s Phenomenology.Dan Zahavi - 2002 - Stanford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
187 ( #61,537 of 2,498,168 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,168 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes