Taking blood from children causes no more than minimal harm

Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (3):127-131 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ethical question of whether taking blood from normal children for research purposes is justified, is determined in part at least, by whether or not the children are harmed. To try to assess the risks, the effects of venepuncture on a group of healthy subjects were studied, by means of a parental questionnaire completed approximately eighteen months after the venepuncture had taken place. Ninety-two healthy children aged between 6 and 8 had a blood sample taken for non-therapeutic reasons as part of a research study. Questionnaire responses reveal few negative effects, and in some cases positive effects

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Harming by conceiving: A review of misconceptions and a new analysis. [REVIEW]Carson Strong - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):491 – 516.
A Duty to Adopt?Daniel Friedrich - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):25-39.
Care drain: who should provide for the children left behind?Anca Gheaus - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):1-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
133 (#137,920)

6 months
6 (#514,728)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?