Confused Perception and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz

The Leibniz Review 13:45-64 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue against the view that Leibniz’s construction of reality out of perceiving substances must be seen as the first of the modern idealist philosophies. I locate this central feature of Leibniz’s thought instead in a decidedly premodern tradition. This tradition sees bodiliness as a consequence of the confused perception of finite substances, and equates God’s uniquely disembodied being with his maximally distinct perceptions. But unlike modern idealism, the premodern view takes confusion as the very feature of any created substance that makes possible its distinctness from the Creator. Modern idealism, in contrast, emerges when the external world becomes a problem, when the epistemological worry arises as to how the mind might access it. In the tradition in which I place Leibniz, there simply is no such worry.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leibniz on spermatozoa and immortality.Justin E. H. Smith - 2007 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (3):264-282.
Was Leibniz Confused about Confusion?Stephen M. Puryear - 2005 - The Leibniz Review 15:95-124.
On Unity and Simple Substance in Leibniz.Samuel Levey - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:61-106.
Daniel Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. [REVIEW]Stephen Puryear - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
19 (#795,462)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Leibniz y la noción de sustancia corpórea en el período medio.Rodolfo Fazio - 2017 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 34 (1):105-125.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references