On Unity and Simple Substance in Leibniz

The Leibniz Review 17:61-106 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is Leibniz’s argument for simple substances? I propose that it is an extension of his prior argument for incorporeal forms as principles of unity for individual corporeal substances. The extension involves seeing the hylomorphic analysis of corporeal substances as implying a resolution of matter into forms, and this seems to demand that forms, which are themselves simple, be the only elements of things. The argument for simples thus presupposes the existence of corporeal substances as a key premise. Yet a theory of simple substances as the elements of things threatens to preclude the existence of corporeal substances for Leibniz, and the extension of the argument for forms into an argument for simples is not cogent. If nothing else rides on the simplicity of individual substances, then perhaps instead of being its most fundamental tenet, the doctrine of simples—the monadology—is something that over-extends and destabilizes Leibniz’s metaphysics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,554

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad.Daniel Garber - 2009 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Leibniz and the Substance of the Vinculum Substantiale.Brandon Look - 2000 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2):203-220.
Aristotle on Substance and Unity.Hye-Kyung Kim - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:79-91.
Unity and Primary Substance for Aristotle.Catherine Jack Deavel - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:159-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
99 (#150,477)

6 months
5 (#192,994)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel Levey
Dartmouth College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references