Corporeal Substances and True Unities: Abstract

The Leibniz Review 4 (2):9-10 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the correspondence with Arnauld, Leibniz contends that each corporeal substance has a substantial form. In support he argues that to be real a corporeal substance must be one and indivisible, a true unity. I will show how this argument precludes a tempting interpretation of corporeal substances as composite unities. Rather it mandates the interpretation that each corporeal substance is a single monad.

Similar books and articles

On Unity and Simple Substance in Leibniz.Samuel Levey - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:61-106.
Aquinas on the Individuation of Non-Living Substances.Christopher M. Brown - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:237-254.
Descartes and Individual Corporeal Substance.Edward Slowik - 2001 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):1 – 15.
Aquinas on the Soul: Substantial Form and Subsistent Entity.Linda P. Jenks - 1985 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
162 (#113,743)

6 months
37 (#94,090)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald L. M. Baxter
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

Corporeal Substances and True Unities.Donald L. M. Baxter - 1995 - Studia Leibnitiana 27 (2):157.
Replies to Perry, Falkenstein, and Garrett. [REVIEW]Donald L. M. Baxter - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 146 (3):445 - 455.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references