Resolving arguments about the sanctity of life: a response to Long

Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (4):198-199 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas Long has argued that there is an irreconcilable metaphysical difference between the views of those who, like ourselves, believe that on quality-of-life grounds it is sometimes justifiable to end the life of a severely handicapped infant, and those who, like Paul Ramsey, reject this view. Because of this metaphysical difference, Long considers it impossible for our arguments to refute Ramsey's position. We disagree

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The sanctity-of-life doctrine in medicine: a critique.Helga Kuhse - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is there a morally relevant difference between human and animal nonpersons?Evelyn Pluhar - 1988 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (1):59-68.
Kuhse, Singer and slippery slopes.G. J. Fairbairn - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):132-147.
Scepticism and Disagreement.Bryan Frances - 2018 - In Diego E. Machuca & Baron Reed (eds.), Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 581-591.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
21 (#727,311)

6 months
4 (#1,004,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

References found in this work

Should the Baby Live?Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer - 1985 - Oxford University Press USA.

Add more references