The Logical Web


Different logic systems are motivated by attempts to fix the counter-intuitive instances of classical argumentative forms, e.g., strengthening of the antecedent, contraposition and conditional negation. These counter-examples are regarded as evidence that classical logic should be rejected in favour of a new logic system in which these argumentative forms are considered invalid. It is argued that these logical revisions are ad hoc, because those controversial argumentative forms are implied by other argumentative forms we want to keep. It is impossible to remove an argumentative form from a logical system without getting entangled in an intricate logical web, since these revisions imply the removal of other parts of a system we want to maintain. Consequently, these revisions are incoherent and unwarranted. At the very least, the usual approach in the analysis of counter-examples of argumentative forms must be seriously reconsidered.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Logical Particularism.Nicole Wyatt & Gillman Payette - 2018 - In Jeremy Wyatt, Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Nathan Kellen (eds.), Pluralisms in Truth and Logic. Cham, Switzerland and Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 277-299.
Establishing Logical Forms.Jaroslav Peregrin & Vladimír Svoboda - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1-22.
Logical Forms, Substitutions and Information Types.Vít Punčochář - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:459-473.
The stoicheiôsis of Proclus’ Elements of Theology.Guillermo Javier Ruz Troncoso - forthcoming - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition:1-23.
Argumentative Passages For Logical Evaluation.[author unknown] - 1981 - Informal Logic 4 (3).


Added to PP

535 (#37,745)

6 months
200 (#17,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inquiry.Robert C. Stalnaker - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.
A philosophical guide to conditionals.Jonathan Bennett - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
On conditionals.Dorothy Edgington - 1995 - Mind 104 (414):235-329.
Philosophical Guide to Conditionals.Jonathan Bennett - 2003 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 68 references / Add more references