Do not resuscitate decisions: discussions with patients

Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (4):186-190 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The problem of psychological pain caused by discussions of do not resuscitate status with patients is addressed. Case histories of patients with such distress are given. We propose that not all patients should be informed of their do not resuscitate status, that the information about such status be given incrementally, and that the giving of further information be guided by the patient's reaction to earlier information. While some affirm the duty of the physician always to inform the patient about his or her do not resuscitate status, we affirm the duty of the physician to determine whether the patient wishes to enter into this discussion

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autonomy and patients' decisions.Merle Spriggs - 2005 - Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
How do patients know?Rebecca Kukla - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (5):27-35.
The individualist model of autonomy and the challenge of disability.Anita Ho - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2-3):193-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
18 (#833,026)

6 months
6 (#520,776)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?