The promises and perils of pragmatism: Commentary on Fins, Bacchetta, and Miller

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):147-152 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Fins, Bacchetta, and Miller's clinical pragmatism has several appealing features: an emphasis on dialogue, a commitment to consensus, a focus on particular individuals rather than persons in general, and a strong interest in the process as well as the product of moral decision making. Nevertheless, for all its protests to the contrary, clinical pragmatism has a tendency to privilege medical facts over nonmedical values, to conflate appropriate medical decisions with right moral decisions, and to conceive problems at the bedside in terms of "getting" patients and families to "go along" with the treatment plans of clinicians. In sum, there is within clinical pragmatism the potential for physicians to take back some of the power they ceded to patients during the height of the patients' rights and autonomy movement. Provided that clinicians guard against the temptation to use clinical pragmatism manipulatively, however, the method promises, more than most other methods of moral problem solving, to help increasingly diverse individuals make good moral decisions about patients' care under conditions of enormous uncertainty

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who should manage care? The case for patients.Robert M. Veatch - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):391-401.
Assessing clinical pragmatism.Lynn A. Jansen - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1):23-36.
Is pragmatism well-suited to bioethics?D. Micah Hester - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):545 – 561.
A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics.David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.
Approximation and Negotiation: Clinical Pragmatism and Difference.Joseph J. Fins - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (1):68-76.
Perspectives on pragmatism: classical, recent, and contemporary.Robert Brandom - 2011 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
15 (#951,094)

6 months
6 (#529,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Common morality and moral reform.K. A. Wallace - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):55-68.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references