Abstract
In contrast to most publications on the ethics of paying research subjects, which start by identifying and analyzing major ethical concerns raised by the practice and end with a set of—more or less well-justified—ethical recommendations for using payment schemes immune to these problems, this paper offers a systematic, principle-based ethical analysis of the practice. It argues that researchers have a prima facie moral obligation to offer payment to research subjects, which stems from the principle of social beneficence. This principle constitutes an ethical “spine” of the practice. Other ethical principles of research ethics make up an ethical “skeleton” of morally sound payment schemes by providing additional moral reasons for offering participants recompense for reasonable expenses; and remuneration conceptualized as a reward for their valuable contribution, provided it meets standards of equality, adequacy and non-exploitation, and it is not overly attractive ; or remuneration conceptualized as a market-driven price, provided it is necessary and designed to help the study achieve its social and scientific goals, it does not reinforce wider social injustices and inequalities; it meets the requirement of non-exploitation; and it is not overly attractive. The principle of justice provides a strong ethical reason for not offering recompenses for lost wages.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-022-10092-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,172
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How Payment For Research Participation Can Be Coercive.Joseph Millum & Michael Garnett - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):21-31.

View all 65 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Measuring Attitudes About Payment for Research.Luke Gelinas - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (12):833-834.
Payments to Research Subjects.Martin Wilkinson - 2005 - Monash Bioethics Review 24 (1):70-74.
Paying Research Subjects: Participants' Perspectives.M. L. Russell - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):126-130.
Increasing the Amount of Payment to Research Subjects.D. B. Resnick - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e14-e14.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-05-26

Total views
1 ( #1,551,851 of 2,517,897 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,897 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes