Hume Studies 38 (1):105-118 (2012)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
At T 1.2.2.3 Hume offers an argument against the infinite divisibility of finite extension, which he ascribes to “Mons. Malezieu.” Scholars have long been aware that the ultimate source of the argument is the Élémens de Géométrie de Monseigneur le Duc de Bourgogne, first published in 1705. Although the argument has figured prominently in several recent discussions of Hume’s metaphysics, there exists as yet no adequate English translation of Malezieu’s text. Furthermore, very little is known about Hume’s immediate sources for the argument. In this article, I provide the original French text with translation. I then inquire into Hume’s knowledge of the text. Drawing on evidence internal to the Treatise passage itself, I consider two plausible sources: a contemporary review of Malezieu’s work in the Nouvelles de la République des Lettres and a critical discussion of the argument in Le Gendre’s Traité de l’opinion. Based on the available evidence, I suggest that the latter was most likely Hume’s source.
|
Keywords | History of Philosophy Major Philosophers |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0319-7336 |
DOI | hume20123816 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Hume on the Unity of Determinations of Extension.Jani Hakkarainen - 2019 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 22 (1):219–233.
Similar books and articles
Hume and the Metaphysical Argument A Priori.M. A. Stewart - 1985 - In Holland (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography.
Hume's Argument Concerning Induction – Skeptical or Explanatory?Paweł Miech - 2010 - Diametros 24:1-13.
Hume’s Argument in Treatise 1.3.3.3: An Exposition and Defense.Gregg Osborne - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (2):225-247.
The Relation Between Literary Form and Philosophical Argument in Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.Martin Bell - 2001 - Hume Studies 27 (2):227-246.
Belief in Miracles: Tillotson's Argument Against Transubstantiation as a Model for Hume. [REVIEW]Michael Levine - 1988 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 23 (3):125 - 160.
Hume’s Argument in Treatise 1.3.3.3: An Exposition and Defense.Gregg Osborne - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (2):225-247.
Hume and The Self: A Critical Response.Alan Schwerin - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (1):15-30.
David Hume's Argument Against Miracles: A Critical Analysis.Francis Beckwith - 1989 - Univ Pr of America.
Hume's Argument That Empirical Knowledge Cannot Be Certain, From the Enquires.Michael H. G. Hoffmann - forthcoming - .
Is Hume a Sceptic with Regard to Reason?Fred Wilson - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:275-319.
Bayesian Analyses of Hume’s Argument Concerning Miracles.Michael Levine - 1997 - Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):101-106.
Is Hume a Sceptic with Regard to Reason?Fred Wilson - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:275-319.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-02-17
Total views
5 ( #1,203,408 of 2,506,506 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,506 )
2017-02-17
Total views
5 ( #1,203,408 of 2,506,506 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,506 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads