Hume Studies 38 (1):105-118 (2012)

Authors
Todd Ryan
Trinity College
Abstract
At T 1.2.2.3 Hume offers an argument against the infinite divisibility of finite extension, which he ascribes to “Mons. Malezieu.” Scholars have long been aware that the ultimate source of the argument is the Élémens de Géométrie de Monseigneur le Duc de Bourgogne, first published in 1705. Although the argument has figured prominently in several recent discussions of Hume’s metaphysics, there exists as yet no adequate English translation of Malezieu’s text. Furthermore, very little is known about Hume’s immediate sources for the argument. In this article, I provide the original French text with translation. I then inquire into Hume’s knowledge of the text. Drawing on evidence internal to the Treatise passage itself, I consider two plausible sources: a contemporary review of Malezieu’s work in the Nouvelles de la République des Lettres and a critical discussion of the argument in Le Gendre’s Traité de l’opinion . Based on the available evidence, I suggest that the latter was most likely Hume’s source
Keywords History of Philosophy  Major Philosophers
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0319-7336
DOI 10.1353/hms.2012.0005
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Hume on the Unity of Determinations of Extension.Jani Hakkarainen - 2019 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 22 (1):219–233.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Belief in Miracles: Tillotson's Argument Against Transubstantiation as a Model for Hume. [REVIEW]Michael Levine - 1988 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 23 (3):125 - 160.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Hume's Positive Argument on Induction.Hsueh Qu - 2014 - Noûs 48 (4):595-625.
Probability and Hume's Inductive Scepticism.David Charles Stove - 1973 - Oxford, UK: Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Hume and The Self: A Critical Response.Alan Schwerin - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (1):15-30.
From Conceivability to Possibility.Roger S. Woolhouse - 1972 - Ratio (Misc.) 14 (2):144--154.
Prophecy, Early Modern Apologetics, and Hume's Argument Against Miracles.Peter Harrison - 1999 - Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (2):241 - 256.
Bayes, Hume, and Miracles.John Earman - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (3):293-310.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-30

Total views
31 ( #368,463 of 2,506,443 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,443 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes