Democratic Duty and the Moral Dilemmas of Soldiers

Ethics 122 (1):10-42 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores the personal responsibility of soldiers for fighting in unjust wars. Its reference point is the position developed by Jeff McMahan in his recent Killing in War. I claim that McMahan fails to give sufficient importance to institutional justifications on this matter. I argue for this by developing what I call the argument to democratic duty, which I claim embodies much current thinking about the obligations of soldiers in a democratic culture. The upshot of my argument is that soldiers are placed in a contradictory position, between personal and institutional obligations. This is one sense in which soldiers can be victimized by the institution of war itself.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-09

Downloads
193 (#102,931)

6 months
25 (#114,568)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

War.Brian Orend - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Political Authority and Unjust Wars.Massimo Renzo - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (2):336-357.
Authority, Oaths, Contracts, and Uncertainty in War.Seth Lazar - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):52-58.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):246-253.
On following orders in an unjust war.David Estlund - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (2):213–234.
Are Liberal Peoples Peaceful?Leif Wenar & Branko Milanovic - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4):462-486.

Add more references