The definition of moral dilemmas: A logical problem [Book Review]
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):267-284 (2001)
Abstract |
This paper concerns one of the undecided disputes of modern moral philosophy: the possibility of moral dilemmas. Whereas proponents of the possibility of moral dilemmas often appeal to moral experience, many opponents refer to ethical theory and deontic logic. My aim in this paper is to clarify some of the tension between moral experience and ethical theory with respect to moral dilemmas. In Part One I try to show that a number of logical arguments against the possibility of moral dilemmas, though apparently very different, turn out to be basically the same, as they are all based on the following concept of ought: if A ought to be done, doing B is impermissible and doing A itself is permissible. In Part Two I present an overview of several definitions of moral dilemmas that have been given by proponents of moral dilemmas: definitions that define moral dilemmas in terms of oughts and definitions that define them in terms of reasons. I conclude that, while reason is to weak, ought is too strong a concept to define moral dilemmas with. In this way, the arguments from Part One create a logical problem for proponents of the possibility of moral dilemmas to define moral dilemmas.
|
Keywords | deontic logic ethical theory incommensurability moral dilemmas moral experience moral internalism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1023/A:1011895415846 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
« L'Existentialisme est un humanisme ».Jean-Paul Sartre - 1946 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 1 (1):79-80.
Citations of this work BETA
Ethics Education in Teacher Preparation: A Case for Stakeholder Responsibility.D. Michael Malone - 2020 - Ethics and Education 15 (1):77-97.
Re‐Assessing the Validity of the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (MSQ): Two New Scales for Moral Deliberation and Paternalism.Luppo Kuilman, Gerard J. Jansen, Laetitia B. Mulder, Berrie Middel & Petrie F. Roodbol - 2020 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 26 (2):659-669.
Psihologia morala si natura judecarii morale. O examinare critica a modelului social intuitionist.Emilian Mihailov - 2015 - In Bogdan Olaru & Andrei Holman (eds.), Contributii la psihologia morala: evaluari ale rezultatelor si noi cercetari empirice. Pro Universitaria. pp. 61-74.
Expressivism, Logic, Consistency, and Moral Dilemmas.Patricia Marino - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (5):517-533.
Moral Pickles, Moral Dilemmas, and the Obligation Preface Paradox.Daniel Immerman - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (8):2087-2101.
View all 8 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
The Moral Dilemmas Debate, Deontic Logic, and the Impotence of Argument.Todd Bernard Weber - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (4):459-472.
The Definition of Moral Dilemmas: A Logical Confusion and a Clarification. [REVIEW]Edgar Morscher - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):485-491.
Moral Dilemmas and Comparative Conceptions of Morality.Peter Vallentyne - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):117-124.
Expressivism and Moral Dilemmas: A Response to Marino.Carl Baker - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):445-455.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
169 ( #68,390 of 2,498,921 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,921 )
2009-01-28
Total views
169 ( #68,390 of 2,498,921 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,921 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads