Reconsidering Methodological Arguments: A Commentary on Stephen L. Smith’s Paper ‘Naïve Expertise: Spacious Alternative to the Standard Account of Method (SAM)’

Philosophy of Management 10 (2):75-90 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Expertise.Karen Jones & François Schroeter - 2012 - Analyse & Kritik 34 (2):217-230.
Rationality and Methodological Change: Dudley Shapere's Conception of Scientific Development.Kólá Abímbólá - 2006 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 10 (1):39-65.
Wait times and national health policy.Alex Rajczi - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (9):632-635.
Semantics without reference.Christopher Gauker - 1990 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31 (3):437-461.
Revelation and the Nature of Colour.Keith Allen - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (2):153-176.
Moral expertise: Judgment, practice, and analysis*: Julia driver.Julia Driver - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):280-296.
Disjunctivism Unmotivated.Gordon Knight - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2):1-18.
In Defense of Naïve Universalism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Faith and Philosophy 20 (3):345-363.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
10 (#1,184,994)

6 months
3 (#968,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Against the So-called ‘Standard Account of Method’.Rod Thomas - 2014 - Philosophy of Management 13 (1):43-72.
Editorial: Care, Mufti, and the Instrumental Turn.Paul Griseri - 2014 - Philosophy of Management 13 (1):1-4.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references