The Relevance of Hegel’s “Absolute Spirit” to Social Normativity

In Heikki Ikäheimo & Arto Laitinen (eds.), Recognition and Social Ontology. Brill. pp. 212--238 (2011)


Around the turn of the twentieth century, Wilhelm Dilthey, in his reflections on the nature of history as a “Geisteswissenschaft”—a science of “spirit” as opposed to “nature”—appealed “to Hegel’s notion of “spirit” (Geist). Attempting to extract Hegel’s concept from what he considered the unsupportable metaphysical system within which it had been developed, Dilthey, a neo-Kantian, gave it a broadly epistemological significance by correlating it with a distinct type of “understanding” (Verstehen) that was foreign to the Naturwissenschaften, concerned as they were with explanation (Erklären) of phenomena in terms of laws of nature. Moreover, the paradigm of such an anti-naturalistic approach to history was not Hegel’s philosophical approach to history, but the strongly empiricist practice of the romantic “historical school”, found paradigmatically in the work of Leopold von Ranke.

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

81 (#146,601)

6 months
1 (#388,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Redding
University of Sydney

References found in this work

Perpetual Peace.IMMANUEL KANT - 1940 - Philosophical Review 49:380.
Language, Rules and Behavior.Wilfrid Sellars - 1950 - In Sidney Hook (ed.), John Dewey: philosopher of science and freedom, a symposium. New York: The Dial Press. pp. 289–315.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Hegel, the Trinity, and the ‘I’.Paolo Diego Bubbio - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (2):129-150.

Add more citations