A Broader Discussion of Authorship

Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):389-398 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While it may be useful to consider the development of new topics in teaching the responsible conduct of research (RCR), it is perhaps equally important to reconsider the traditionally taught core topic areas in both more nuanced and broader ways. This paper takes the topic of authorship as an example. Through the description of two specific cases from sociocultural anthropology, ideas about credit and responsibility are examined. It is suggested that placing more focus on the array of meanings found in the act of authoring might help students see themselves as part of a wider community both of scientists and beyond science

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics.David B. Resnik & Zubin Master - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):17 - 21.
Observations on Unacknowledged Authorship from Homer to Now.Alex C. Michalos - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (4):253-258.
Policies and perspectives on authorship.Mary Rose & Karla Fischer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):361-370.
Proliferation of authors on research reports in medicine.Joost P. H. Drenth - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):469-480.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-04

Downloads
18 (#777,769)

6 months
3 (#857,336)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?