Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):365-388 (2011)

Abstract
An historical review of authorship definitions and publication practices that are embedded in directions to authors and in the codes of ethics in the fields of psychology, sociology, and education illuminates reasonable agreement and consistency across the fields with regard to (a) originality of the work submitted, (b) data sharing, (c) human participants’ protection, and (d) conflict of interest disclosure. However, the role of the professional association in addressing violations of research or publication practices varies among these fields. Psychology and sociology provide active oversight with sanction authority. In education, the association assumes a more limited role: to develop and communicate standards to evoke voluntary compliance. With respect to authorship credit, each association’s standards focus on criteria for inclusion as an author, other than on the author’s ability to defend and willingness to take responsibility for the entire work. Discussions across a broad range of research disciplines beyond the social sciences would likely be beneficial. Whether improved standards will reduce either misattribution or perceptions of inappropriate attribution of credit within social science disciplines will likely depend on how well authorship issues are addressed in responsible conduct of research education (RCR), in research practice, and in each association’s ongoing efforts to influence normative practice by specifying and clarifying best practices
Keywords Authorship credit  Social sciences  Publication policies  Publication ethics  Codes of ethics  Responsible conduct of research  RCR  Psychology  Sociology  Education
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-011-9280-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2006 - Studies in East European Thought 58 (1):63-68.
Instructions to Authors.[author unknown] - 2004 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (3):353-354.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Policies and Perspectives on Authorship.Mary Rose & Karla Fischer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):361-370.
An Introduction to Research Ethics.Paul J. Friedman - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):443-456.
Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics.David B. Resnik & Zubin Master - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):17 - 21.
Proliferation of Authors on Research Reports in Medicine.Joost P. H. Drenth - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):469-480.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-06-10

Total views
27 ( #425,673 of 2,519,698 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,824 of 2,519,698 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes