Searle, Strong AI, and Two Ways of Sorting Cucumbers

Journal of Philosophical Research 17:347-350 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper defends Searle against the misconstrual of a key claim of “Minds, Brains, and Programs” and goes on to explain why an attempt to turn the tables by using the Chinese Room to argue for intentionality in computers fails.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Searle, strong AI, and two ways of sorting cucumbers.Karl Pfeifer - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17:347-50.
Searle's chinese room argument.Larry Hauser - unknown - Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
Chinese room argument.Larry Hauser - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Modal Defence of Strong AI.Steffen Borge - 2007 - In Dermot Moran Stephen Voss (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy. The Philosophical Society of Turkey. pp. 127-131.
A Modal Defence of Strong AI.Steffen Borge - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:127-131.
Searle on strong AI.Philip Cam - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):103-8.
Can semantics be syntactic?Neal Jahren - 1990 - Synthese 82 (3):309-28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
33 (#483,256)

6 months
7 (#425,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karl Pfeifer
University of Saskatchewan

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references