The New Hume Debate, Edited By Rupert Read, Kenneth Richman [Book Review]

Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (1):132-134 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Review of The New Hume Debate Revised Edition Edited By Rupert Read, Kenneth Richman: Pub: 2000 '... The editors have done an excellent job of choosing and presenting some of the more important papers on this subject. The volume contains a useful bibliography and a citation index. ... There is also a helpful introduction, written by Richman, which provides a synopsis of the individual papers in this volume. A few important contributions are not included in the collection ... Nevertheless, all the papers that are included are well worthwhile and serve the editors’ stated aim in their Preface, which is to offer “insights not only into the most difficult issues of the interpretation of some of Western philosophy’s most vital texts, but also into an absolutely central example of the relevance of the philosophical history of philosophy to contemporary philosophy, in . . . accessible form.” '

Similar books and articles

Hume on suicide.R. G. Frey - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (4):336 – 351.
The New Hume Debate. [REVIEW]Corliss G. Swain - 2002 - Hume Studies 28 (1):157-160.
Hume on free will.Paul Russell - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
258 (#78,087)

6 months
94 (#49,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Russell
Lund University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Postscript.[author unknown] - 1964 - Vivarium 2 (1):161-162.

Add more references