Kinetic Values, Mobility (in)equalities, and Ageing in Smart Urban Environments

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (5):1139-1153 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea of the right to mobility has been fundamental to modern Western citizenship and is expressed in many legal and government documents. Although there is widespread acceptance regarding the importance of mobility in older adults, there have been few attempts to develop ethical and theoretical tools to portray mobility equalities in old age. This paper develops a novel conceptualisation of kinetic values focusing on older adults whose ability to move has been restricted for internal and external reasons. Informed by the phenomenological theory of kinaesthesia, I suggest that kinetic values are related to four principal dimensions: self-motion, being-moved, co-motion, and forced movement. I assume that these dimensions can address the key dilemma of human dignity among older adults who suffer from losing their autonomy and agency through their mobility impairments and who are at risk of being confined to their homes. To concretise the formulation of kinetic values, I study movement as part of technological equipment and urban infrastructure to examine what kinds of kinetic values mobility services and assistive robots convey for older adults in smart urban environments. By bridging disciplines, the phenomenological approach provides a novel understanding of mobility and the interplay among assistive technologies, kinaesthesia, and urban technological infrastructure. The approach suggests that kinetic values should be interpreted more comprehensively so that kinaesthesia can become better identified as a positive life-promoting practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Urban Mobility—Urban Discovery.Jonathan Maskit - 2018 - Environmental Philosophy 15 (1):43-58.
Smart City Experimentation in Urban Mobility—Exploring the Politics of Futuring in Hamburg.Philipp Späth & Jörg Knieling - 2019 - In Andreas Lösch, Armin Grunwald, Martin Meister & Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer (eds.), Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present: Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 161-185.
Smart, Age-friendly Cities and Communities: the Emergence of Socio-technological Solutions in the Central and Eastern Europe.Andrzej Klimczuk & Łukasz Tomczyk - 2016 - In Francisco Flórez-Revuelta & Alexandros Andre Chaaraoui (eds.), Active and Assisted Living: Technologies and Applications. The Institution of Engineering and Technology. pp. 335--359.
Mobility.Dittmar Dahlmann - 2019 - In Ludger Kühnhardt & Tilman Mayer (eds.), The Bonn Handbook of Globality: Volume 1. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 635-644.
Well-being and mobility: A new perspective.Avigail Ferdman - 2021 - Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 146:44-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-29

Downloads
15 (#941,877)

6 months
5 (#625,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jaana Parviainen
Tampere University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations