Difficult Trade-Offs in Response to COVID-19: The Case for Open and Inclusive Decision-Making

Nature Medicine 27:10-13 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that deliberative decision-making that is inclusive, transparent and accountable can contribute to more trustworthy and legitimate decisions on difficult ethical questions and political trade-offs during the pandemic and beyond.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Procedural Justice in Young's Inclusive Deliberative Democracy.Ben Eggleston - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (4):544–549.
COVID-19, the UN, and Dispersed Global Health Security.Sophie Harman - 2020 - Ethics and International Affairs 34 (3):373-378.
What’s happening in open science?Adeline Rosenberg - 2020 - Weekly Digest Open Pharma 2020 (6).

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-04

Downloads
370 (#52,251)

6 months
82 (#52,408)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Liam Kofi Bright
London School of Economics
Alex Voorhoeve
London School of Economics

References found in this work

Science, truth, and democracy.Philip Kitcher - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Why Deliberative Democracy?Amy Gutmann & Dennis F. Thompson - 2004 - Princeton University Press.
On value-laden science.Zina B. Ward - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 85:54-62.
How much evidence should one collect?Remco Heesen - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2299-2313.

Add more references