Australasian Journal of Philosophy 100 (1):180-194 (2022)
AbstractABSTRACT Sometimes it seems that an existing bearer of value should be preserved even though it could be destroyed and replaced with something of equal or greater value. How can this conservative intuition be explained and justified? This paper distinguishes three answers, which I call existential, attitudinal, and object-affecting conservatism. I raise some problems for existential and attitudinal conservatism, and suggest how they can be solved by object-affecting conservatism.
Similar books and articles
Cohen’s Conservatism and Human Enhancement.Jonathan Pugh, Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu - 2013 - The Journal of Ethics 17 (4):331-354.
Conservatism in the 1990s, Our Common Purpose.John Roy Major, Carlton Club & Conservative Political Centre Britain) - 1993 - Carlton Club Political Committee in Association with the Conservative Political Centre.
Conservatism, analytically reconsidered.Martin Beckstein & Francis Cheneval - 2016 - Beckstein, Martin; Cheneval, Francis . Conservatism, Analytically Reconsidered. The Monist, 99:333-335.
Phenomenal conservatism, classical foundationalism, and internalist justification.Ali Hasan - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):119-141.
Phenomenal conservatism and self-defeat: a reply to DePoe.Michael Huemer - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (1):1-13.
Compassionate phenomenal conservatism.Michael Huemer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):30–55.
An evaluative conservative case for biomedical enhancement.John Danaher - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (9):611-618.
Conservatism, Basic Beliefs, and the Diachronic and Social Nature of Epistemic Justification.Jeremy Koons - 2006 - Episteme 2 (3):203-218.
Bioconservatism, Partiality, and the Human-Nature Objection to Enhancement.Pugh Jonathan, Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu - 2016 - The Monist 99 (4):406-422.
Does Doxastic Justification Have a Basing Requirement?Paul Silva - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):371-387.
John Kekes, A Case for Conservatism:A Case for Conservatism. [REVIEW]Andrew Jason Cohen - 2001 - Ethics 111 (2):411-414.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.