Ethics, public health and technology responses to COVID‐19

Bioethics 35 (4):366-371 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic has infected millions around the world. Governments initially responded by requiring businesses to close and citizens to self‐isolate, as well as funding vaccine research and implementing a range of technologies to monitor and limit the spread of the disease. This article considers the use of smartphone metadata and Bluetooth applications for public health surveillance purposes in relation to COVID‐19. It undertakes ethical analysis of these measures, particularly in relation to collective moral responsibility, considering whether citizens ought, or should be compelled, to comply with government measures.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Good and Bad Reasoning about COVID-19.Louise Cummings - 2020 - Informal Logic 40 (4):521-544.
COVID-19 Ethics—Looking Down the Muzzle.Grant Gillett - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (4):501-502.
Chinese Bioethicists Speak Out on Covid‐19, and Others Follow.Susan Gilbert - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (2):inside_front_cover-inside_front_.
The COVID-19 containment in Vietnam: What are we doing?Toan Luu Duc Huynh - 2020 - Journal of Global Health 10 (1):010338.
A tale of two fields: public health ethics.Craig Klugman - 2008 - Monash Bioethics Review 27 (1-2):56-64.
After COVID-19: The Way We Die from Now On.Anna Magdalena Elsner - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (1):69-72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-18

Downloads
24 (#654,246)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?