Neurolaw: Neuroscience, Ethics, and Law. Review Essay

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):819-829 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neurolaw is a new, rapidly developing area of interdisciplinary research on the meaning and implications of neuroscience for the law and legal practices. In this article three recently published volumes in this field will be reviewed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neurolaw and Direct Brain Interventions.Nicole A. Vincent - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):43-50.
Is Neurolaw Conceptually Confused?Neil Levy - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):171-185.
A Compatibilist Theory of Legal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (3):477-498.
Neuroethics.Katrina Sifferd - 2016 - In Vilayanur Ramachandran (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2e. Elsevier.
Neuroscience and Criminal Justice: Introduction.Jesper Ryberg - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):77-80.
Minds, Brains, and Norms.Dennis Patterson - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):179-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-14

Downloads
88 (#192,337)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gerben Meynen
VU University Amsterdam