On the Stand. Another Episode of Neuroscience and Law Discussion From Italy

Neuroethics 7 (2):243-245 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After three proceedings in which neuroscience was a relevant factor for the final verdict in Italian courts, for the first time a recent case puts in question the legal relevance of neuroscientific evidence. This decision deserves international attention in its underlining that the uncertainty still affecting neuroscientific knowledge can have a significant impact on the law. It urges the consideration of such uncertainty and the development of a shared management of it

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,310

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Minds, Brains, and Norms.Dennis Patterson - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):179-190.
No Nonsense Neuro-Law.Sarah K. Robins & Carl F. Craver - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):195-203.
Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues.Michael Freeman (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Reciprocity and Neuroscience in Public Health Law.A. M. Viens - 2011 - In Michael Freeman (ed.), Law and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Neuroethics.Katrina Sifferd - 2016 - In Vilayanur Ramachandran (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 3e. Elsevier.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-29

Downloads
48 (#241,697)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?