Resolving deep disagreement

In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Ossa (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The shocking statement made by Robert Fogelin over 20 years ago when he claimed that discourses that are in deep disagreement cannot be resolved rationally, is still causing many problems to argumentation theorists. In this paper, however, I argue that discourses that are in deep disagreement, at least some of them, can be rationally resolved by introducing the concept of “third party” to those particular discourses

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

An Alternative to Relativism.John K. Davis - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (2):17-37.
The Problem of Deep Disagreement.Klemens Kappel - 2012 - Discipline Filosofiche 22 (2):7-25.
Disagreement Over Vaccination Programmes: Deep Or Merely Complex and Why Does It Matter? [REVIEW]Tim Dare - 2013 - HEC Forum 26 (1):43-57.
Arguing, Arguments, and Deep Disagreements.Peter Davson-Galle - 1992 - Informal Logic 14 (2).
Radical moral disagreement in contemporary health care: A Roman catholic perspective.Joseph Boyle - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (2):183-200.
Evolution, Neutrality, and Antecedent Probability: a Reply to Van Till and McMullin.Alvin Plantinga - 1991 - Christian Scholar's Review 21 (1):80-109.
No Deep Disagreement for New Relativists.Ragnar Francén - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (1):19--37.
Erratum to: Resolving Disagreement Through Mutual Respect. [REVIEW]Carlo Martini, Jan Sprenger & Mark Colyvan - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S3):669-670.
Virtue Ethics and the Problem of Moral Disagreement.Christine Swanton - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (2):157-180.
Emotional Backing and the Feeling of Deep Disagreement.Richard Friemann - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (1):51-63.
Disagreement Without Error.Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S1):143-154.
Revisiting deep disagreement.Dale Turner & Larry Wright - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (1):25-35.
Disagreement: Ethics and Elsewhere.Folke Tersman - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S1):55-72.
Introduction: Deep Disagreement Re-examined.Dale Turner & Chris Campolo - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (1):1-2.
Are there any rules?Timothy Endicott - 2001 - The Journal of Ethics 5 (3):199-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
49 (#323,453)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Epistemic injustice and deepened disagreement.T. J. Lagewaard - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (5):1571-1592.
Arrogance and deep disagreement.Andrew Aberdein - 2020 - In Alessandra Tanesini & Michael P. Lynch (eds.), Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism: Philosophical Perspectives. London: Routledge. pp. 39-52.
The Epistemic Value of Deep Disagreements.Kirk Lougheed - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (2):263-292.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The logic of deep disagreements.Robert Fogelin - 1985 - Informal Logic 7 (1):3-11.
Knowing when disagreements are deep.David M. Adams - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (1):65-77.

View all 8 references / Add more references