- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (4):249-254 (1969)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
PERELMAN, Ch. and OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, L. - "The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation", translated by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. [REVIEW]M. Gilbert - 1971 - Mind 80:626.
Ways of being reasonable: Perelman and the philosophers.Christopher W. Tindale - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):337-361.
The Role of Audience in Argumentation from the Perspective of Informal Logic.Ralph H. Johnson - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):533-549.
The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation.Chaïm Perelman - 1969 - Notre Dame, [Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press. Edited by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca.
Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise. [REVIEW]Christopher W. Tindale - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):447-466.
On the origin of normative argumentation theory: The paradoxical case of the Rhetoric to Alexander. [REVIEW]AntoineC Braet - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (3):347-359.
Ch. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, "The New Rhetorica: A Treatise on Argumentation". [REVIEW]Henry W. Johnstone - 1971 - Man and World 4 (2):224.
The brussels school of rhetoric: From the new rhetoric to problematology.Michel Meyer - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):403-429.
A Place for Figures of Speech in Argumentation Theory.Christian Plantin - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):325-337.
On Temporality as a Characteristic of Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):315-336.
Con Amore: Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Philosophy of Argumentation.James Crosswhite - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
The empirical relevance of Perelman's New Rhetoric.Manfred Kienpointner - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):419-437.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-21
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2017-02-21
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2009 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 42 (2):154-182.
Dynamic inference and everyday conditional reasoning in the new paradigm.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):346-379.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo