The Violence of Care: An Analysis of Foucault's Pastor

Journal of Cultural and Religious Theory (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper will address Foucault’s analysis of the Hebrew and Christian pastor and argue that Foucault’s analysis of pastoral power in Security, Territory, Population neglects an important characteristic of the shepherd/pastor figure: violence. Despite Foucault’s close analysis of the early development of the Hebrew pastor, he overlooks the role of violence and instead focuses on sacrifice. However the sacrificial pastor does not figure in the Hebrew Scriptures. The Hebrew pastor is called to lead, feed and protect the flock, not sacrifice for them. This is not to suggest that the theme of sacrifice is absent in the Hebrew Scriptures but that sacrifice is not a role attributed to the pastor until Jesus’ reinterpretation of the “good shepherd” in Chapter 10 of The Gospel of John.4 In distinguishing the Hebrew and Christian formulations of the pastor, the roles of violence and sacrifice in each can be understood more clearly. Beginning with the Hebrew Scriptures I will demonstrate the importance of violence in the figure of David as the first “shepherd of men”. I will argue that violence and the ability to protect the flock was a significant and determining characteristic of the Hebrew pastor. Contrary to Foucault’s assertion I will demonstrate that sacrifice was not a role attributed to the Hebrew pastor. While the words and life of Jesus provide a new sacrificial paradigm for understanding the “shepherd of men,” it is Paul who provides the foundation on which the practice of the Christian pastor is established in the Church. Therefore I will examine the writing of Paul to demonstrate the way violence operates in the Christian pastorate. I will argue that sacrifice does not replace violence but violence is subsumed in the sacrificial pastor and continues to operate. Finally I will suggest that the introduction of violence into Foucault’s analysis establishes a deeper connection between pastoral power and biopower. Thus, this connection engenders a richer understanding of the tension in Foucault’s work between care and violence in the poles of biopower: to make live and let die.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Logic of Violence: Foucault on How Power Kills.Peter DeAngelis - 2011 - In Nathan Eckstrand & Christopher S. Yates (eds.), Philosophy and the return of violence: studies from this widening gyre. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Torture and democratic violence.Paul W. Kahn - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (2):244-259.
Sacrifice Imagined: Violence, Atonement, and the Sacred.Douglas Hedley - 2011 - Continuum International Publishing Group.
The practice of linguistic nonviolence.William C. Gay - 1998 - Peace Review 10 (4):545-547.
Michel Foucault: caja de herramientas contra la dominación.Juan Pastor Martín - 2007 - Oviedo (Asturias): Universidad de Oviedo. Edited by Anastasio Ovejero Bernal.
Sartre on Violence: Not So Ambivalent?Michael Fleming - 2011 - Sartre Studies International 17 (1):20-40.
A Western Perspective on the Problem of Violence.Robert L. Holmes - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:193-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-07

Downloads
511 (#36,511)

6 months
68 (#70,292)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Mayes
Deakin University

References found in this work

The Subject and Power.Michel Foucault - 1982 - Critical Inquiry 8 (4):777-795.

Add more references